Estimating Methods of the Undetected Infections in the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Systematic Review

Author:

Mehraeen Esmaeil1,Pashaei Zahra2,Akhtaran Fatemeh Khajeh3,Dashti Mohsen4,Afzalian Arian5,Ghasemzadeh Afsaneh4,Asili Pooria6,Kahrizi Mohammad Saeed7,Mirahmad Maryam6,Rahimi Ensiyeh2,Matini Parisa8,Afsahi Amir Masoud9,Dadras Omid210,SeyedAlinaghi SeyedAhmad2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Information Technology, Khalkhal University of Medical Sciences, Khalkhal, Iran

2. Iranian Research Center for HIV/AIDS, Iranian Institute for Reduction of High-Risk Behaviors, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3. Social and Economic Statistics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

4. Department of Radiology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

5. School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

6. Department of Pathology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

7. School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Alborz, Iran

8. School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Iran

9. Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego (UCSD), California, USA

10. Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Abstract

Introduction: The accurate number of COVID-19 cases is essential knowledge to control an epidemic. Currently, one of the most important obstacles in estimating the exact number of COVID-19 patients is the absence of typical clinical symptoms in a large number of people, called asymptomatic infections. In this systematic review, we included and evaluated the studies mainly focusing on the prediction of undetected COVID-19 incidence and mortality rates as well as the reproduction numbers, utilizing various mathematical models. Methods: This systematic review aims to investigate the estimating methods of undetected infections in the COVID-19 outbreak. Databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and Embase, were searched for a combination of keywords. Applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, all retrieved English literature by April 7, 2022, were reviewed for data extraction through a two-step screening process; first, titles/abstracts, and then full-text. This study is consistent with the PRISMA checklist. Results: In this study, 61 documents were retrieved using a systematic search strategy. After an initial review of retrieved articles, 6 articles were excluded and the remaining 55 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. Most of the studies used mathematical models to estimate the number of underreported asymptomatic infected cases, assessing incidence and prevalence rates more precisely. The spread of COVID-19 has been investigated using various mathematical models. The output statistics were compared with official statistics obtained from different countries. Although the number of reported patients was lower than the estimated numbers, it appeared that the mathematical calculations could be a useful measure to predict pandemics and proper planning. Conclusion: In conclusion, our study demonstrates the effectiveness of mathematical models in unraveling the true burden of the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of more precise, and accurate infection and mortality rates, and reproduction numbers, thus, statistical mathematical modeling could be an effective tool for measuring the detrimental global burden of pandemic infections. Additionally, they could be a really useful method for future pandemics and would assist the healthcare and public health systems with more accurate and valid information.

Publisher

Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

Subject

Microbiology (medical),Pharmacology,Molecular Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3