Comparison of flow in numerical and physical models of a ventricular assist device using low- and high-viscosity fluids

Author:

König C S1,Clark C1,Mokhtarzadeh-Dehghan M R2

Affiliation:

1. Brunel University, Uxbridge Department of Manufacturing and Engineering Systems UK

2. Brunel University, Uxbridge Department of Mechanical Engineering UK

Abstract

The flows in a model of a ventricular assist device (VAD) were investigated numerically and experimentally for two different Newtonian test fluids. These were a blood analogue fluid and a much higher viscosity fluid. A finite volume method was employed to solve the governing equations for a three-dimensional unsteady laminar flow on a transient grid. The numerical solutions were compared with experimental results from an identical physical model. The experimental flows were investigated by flow visualization and by laser Doppler velocity measurements at selected points in the flow field. The validation was based on comparisons of flow patterns and of one-component velocity-time histories. The maximum Reynolds numbers in the inflow tube of the model VAD were approximately 460 and 3300 using the high- and low-viscosity fluids respectively. The investigation showed that the flow patterns were better predicted for the high-viscosity fluid. However, the agreement between the velocity-time histories was found to be slightly better for the low-viscosity fluid. The discrepancies in the flow patterns may be due to intermittent turbulence with a further contribution from numerical diffusion.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,General Medicine

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Suitability of Different Blood-Analogous Fluids in Determining the Pump Characteristics of a Ventricular Assist Device;Fluids;2023-05-11

2. Modeling Hemodynamics of Rotary Blood Pumps and Predicting the Potential Risks;Applied Complex Flow;2023

3. A numerical analysis on different-generation prototypes of ventricular assist device;International Journal of Modeling, Simulation, and Scientific Computing;2019-10

4. Investigating the impact of non‐Newtonian blood models within a heart pump;International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering;2016-04-13

5. Assessment of turbulence models for pulsatile flow inside a heart pump;Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering;2015-03-27

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3