AI and Disaster Risk: A Practitioner Perspective

Author:

Moitra Aparna1,Wagenaar Dennis2,Kalirai Manveer1,Ahmed Syed Ishtiaque1,Soden Robert1

Affiliation:

1. University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

2. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

Abstract

Emerging techniques developed by AI researchers promise to offer the capacity to support disaster risk management (DRM), through making data collection or analysis practices faster, less costly, or more accurate. However, in every socially consequential domain in which AI tools have been applied, these technologies have been demonstrated to have some degree of negative consequences. This paper explores an attempt to convene technical experts in the area of DRM to discuss potential negative impacts, their approaches toward mitigating these impacts as well as identifying some of the overarching challenges. In doing so, we contribute new findings about a domain that has received relatively little attention from critical and ethical AI researchers, and the opportunities and limitations that are presented by working with domain experts to evaluate the social consequences of emerging technologies.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference66 articles.

1. [n.d.]. https://www.undrr.org/terminology/disaster-risk [n.d.]. https://www.undrr.org/terminology/disaster-risk

2. [n.d.]. Disaster risk reduction and disaster risk management. https://www.preventionweb.net/understanding-disaster-risk/key-concepts/disaster-risk-reduction-disaster-risk-management [n.d.]. Disaster risk reduction and disaster risk management. https://www.preventionweb.net/understanding-disaster-risk/key-concepts/disaster-risk-reduction-disaster-risk-management

3. Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction

4. Mike Ananny and Kate Crawford . 2018. Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability . New Media & Society 20, 3 ( March 2018 ), 973--989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645 Publisher : SAGE Publications . 10.1177/1461444816676645 Mike Ananny and Kate Crawford. 2018. Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society 20, 3 (March 2018), 973--989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645 Publisher: SAGE Publications.

5. Chelsea Barabas , Madars Virza , Karthik Dinakar , Joichi Ito , and Jonathan Zittrain . 2018 . Interventions over Predictions: Reframing the Ethical Debate for Actuarial Risk Assessment . In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. PMLR, 62--76 . http://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/barabas18a.html ISSN: 2640--3498. Chelsea Barabas, Madars Virza, Karthik Dinakar, Joichi Ito, and Jonathan Zittrain. 2018. Interventions over Predictions: Reframing the Ethical Debate for Actuarial Risk Assessment. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. PMLR, 62--76. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/barabas18a.html ISSN: 2640--3498.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3