Affiliation:
1. Golisano College of Computing and Information Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, USA
2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, USA
Abstract
We investigate the degree to which undergraduate computing students in a United States university consider accessibility several years after instruction. Prior work has found that cultural and ethical norms become ingrained early in STEM professionals’ careers; so, we focus on students approaching graduation and after an internship experience, who are just getting started in their career. In semi-structured interviews, a majority of these final-year computing students (14 of 16) indicated that they were not motivated to improve their skills in accessibility, attributing this to
not being required to consider accessibility in subsequent work or classes, not seeing accessibility as an essential skill in their profession
, and
challenges due to a learn-it-on-your-own approach
in computing. Participants suggested instructional methods and topics that they believed would have better prepared them for considering accessibility. A survey of 114 additional final-year students revealed similar themes, including that students did not personally view accessibility training as essential career preparation. Prior research has largely focused on evaluating short-term changes in students’ knowledge after an educational intervention. Therefore, by focusing on students several years after an intervention, this work highlights lingering barriers for university programs in promoting accessibility among rising computing professionals.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
Education,General Computer Science
Reference67 articles.
1. Accreditation Board for Engineering Technology. 2013. Criteria for accrediting engineering programs 2014–2015. Cycle 25. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/Linked Documents-UPDATE/Criteria and PP/C001 08-09 CAC Criteria 11-8-07.pdf. Accreditation Board for Engineering Technology. 2013. Criteria for accrediting engineering programs 2014–2015. Cycle 25. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/Linked Documents-UPDATE/Criteria and PP/C001 08-09 CAC Criteria 11-8-07.pdf.
2. Exploring factors that influence computer science introductory course students to persist in the major
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献