A Controlled Experiment on Python vs C for an Introductory Programming Course

Author:

Wainer Jacques1,Xavier Eduardo C.1

Affiliation:

1. University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil

Abstract

We performed a controlled experiment comparing a C and a Python Introductory Programming course. Three faculty members at University of Campinas, Brazil, taught the same CS1 course for the same majors in two different semesters, one version in Python and one in C, with a total of 391 students involved in the experiment. We measured the dropout rate, the failure rate, the grades on the two exams, the proportion of completed lab assignments, and the number of submissions per completed assignment. There was no difference in the dropout rate. The failure rate for Python was 16.9% against 23.1% for C. The effect size (Cohen’s D) on the comparison of Python against C on the midterm exam was 0.27, and 0.38 for the final exam. The effect size for the proportion of completed assignments was 0.39 and the effect size for the number of submissions per assignment was -0.61 (Python had less submissions per completed assignments). Thus, for all measures, with the exception of dropout rate, the version of the course in Python yielded better student outcomes than the version in C and all differences are significant (with 95% confidence) with the exception of the failure rate ( p -value=0.12).

Funder

Fapesp

CNPq

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Education,General Computer Science

Reference42 articles.

1. A Confidence Interval for a Percentage Increase

2. Jacob Cohen. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Jacob Cohen. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

3. Teaching objects-first in introductory computer science

4. All syntax errors are not equal

5. Understanding the syntax barrier for novices

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Perceptual Learning Modules (PLM) in CS1: a Negative Result and a Methodological Warning;JUCS - Journal of Universal Computer Science;2023-09-28

2. Visual vs. Textual Programming Languages in CS0.5;Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1;2023-03-02

3. Learning analytics in programming courses: Review and implications;Education and Information Technologies;2023-02-16

4. Good Students are Good Students Student Achievement with Visual versus Textual Programming;2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE);2022-10-08

5. Investigating the impact of adopting Python and C languages for introductory engineering programming courses;Computer Applications in Engineering Education;2022-09-21

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3