Affiliation:
1. University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
Abstract
We performed a controlled experiment comparing a C and a Python Introductory Programming course. Three faculty members at University of Campinas, Brazil, taught the same CS1 course for the same majors in two different semesters, one version in Python and one in C, with a total of 391 students involved in the experiment. We measured the dropout rate, the failure rate, the grades on the two exams, the proportion of completed lab assignments, and the number of submissions per completed assignment. There was no difference in the dropout rate. The failure rate for Python was 16.9% against 23.1% for C. The effect size (Cohen’s D) on the comparison of Python against C on the midterm exam was 0.27, and 0.38 for the final exam. The effect size for the proportion of completed assignments was 0.39 and the effect size for the number of submissions per assignment was -0.61 (Python had less submissions per completed assignments). Thus, for all measures, with the exception of dropout rate, the version of the course in Python yielded better student outcomes than the version in C and all differences are significant (with 95% confidence) with the exception of the failure rate (
p
-value=0.12).
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
Education,General Computer Science
Reference42 articles.
1. A Confidence Interval for a Percentage Increase
2. Jacob Cohen. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Jacob Cohen. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
3. Teaching objects-first in introductory computer science
4. All syntax errors are not equal
5. Understanding the syntax barrier for novices
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献