How Data ScientistsWork Together With Domain Experts in Scientific Collaborations

Author:

Mao Yaoli1,Wang Dakuo2,Muller Michael3,Varshney Kush R.4,Baldini Ioana2,Dugan Casey3,Mojsilović Aleksandra2

Affiliation:

1. Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

2. IBM Research, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA

3. IBM Research, Cambridge, MA, USA

4. IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA

Abstract

In recent years there has been an increasing trend in which data scientists and domain experts work together to tackle complex scientific questions. However, such collaborations often face challenges. In this paper, we aim to decipher this collaboration complexity through a semi-structured interview study with 22 interviewees from teams of bio-medical scientists collaborating with data scientists. In the analysis, we adopt the Olsons' four-dimensions framework proposed in Distance Matters to code interview transcripts. Our findings suggest that besides the glitches in the collaboration readiness, technology readiness, and coupling of work dimensions, the tensions that exist in the common ground building process influence the collaboration outcomes, and then persist in the actual collaboration process. In contrast to prior works' general account of building a high level of common ground, the breakdowns of content common ground together with the strengthen of process common ground in this process is more beneficial for scientific discovery. We discuss why that is and what the design suggestions are, and conclude the paper with future directions and limitations.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference104 articles.

1. Effect of Framing as Gain versus Loss on Understanding and Hypothetical Treatment Choices: Survival and Mortality Curves

2. The PRO-ACT database: Design, initial analyses, and predictive features

3. Daniel E Atkins Kelvin K Droegemeier Stuart I Feldman Hector Garcia-Molina Michael L Klein David G Messerschmitt Paul Messina Jeremiah P Ostriker and Margaret H Wright. 2003. Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure. Report of the National Science Foundation blue-ribbon advisory panel on cyberinfrastructure Vol. 1 (2003). Daniel E Atkins Kelvin K Droegemeier Stuart I Feldman Hector Garcia-Molina Michael L Klein David G Messerschmitt Paul Messina Jeremiah P Ostriker and Margaret H Wright. 2003. Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure. Report of the National Science Foundation blue-ribbon advisory panel on cyberinfrastructure Vol. 1 (2003).

4. Rowland Atkinson and John Flint. 2001. Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social research update Vol. 33 1 (2001) 1--4. Rowland Atkinson and John Flint. 2001. Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social research update Vol. 33 1 (2001) 1--4.

5. Common Ground, Complex Problems and Decision Making

Cited by 70 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. AINeedsPlanner: A Workbook to Support Effective Collaboration Between AI Experts and Clients;Designing Interactive Systems Conference;2024-07

2. Key Insights from a Feature Discovery User Study;Proceedings of the 2024 Workshop on Human-In-the-Loop Data Analytics;2024-06-14

3. Analysing Intersubjective Relations in Collaborative Design Ideation Process;Archives of Design Research;2024-05-31

4. Transitioning Towards a Proactive Practice: A Longitudinal Field Study on the Implementation of a ML System in Adult Social Care;Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2024-05-11

5. Leveraging Large Language Models to Enhance Domain Expert Inclusion in Data Science Workflows;Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2024-05-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3