Here’s What I’ve Learned: Asking Questions that Reveal Reward Learning

Author:

Habibian Soheil1ORCID,Jonnavittula Ananth1ORCID,Losey Dylan P.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA

Abstract

Robots can learn from humans by asking questions. In these questions, the robot demonstrates a few different behaviors and asks the human for their favorite. But how should robots choose which questions to ask? Today’s robots optimize for informative questions that actively probe the human’s preferences as efficiently as possible. But while informative questions make sense from the robot’s perspective, human onlookers may find them arbitrary and misleading . For example, consider an assistive robot learning to put away the dishes. Based on your answers to previous questions this robot knows where it should stack each dish; however, the robot is unsure about right height to carry these dishes. A robot optimizing only for informative questions focuses purely on this height: it shows trajectories that carry the plates near or far from the table, regardless of whether or not they stack the dishes correctly. As a result, when we see this question, we mistakenly think that the robot is still confused about where to stack the dishes! In this article, we formalize active preference-based learning from the human’s perspective. We hypothesize that—from the human’s point-of-view —the robot’s questions reveal what the robot has and has not learned. Our insight enables robots to use questions to make their learning process transparent to the human operator. We develop and test a model that robots can leverage to relate the questions they ask to the information these questions reveal. We then introduce a tradeoff between informative and revealing questions that considers both human and robot perspectives: a robot that optimizes for this tradeoff actively gathers information from the human while simultaneously keeping the human up to date with what it has learned. We evaluate our approach across simulations, online surveys, and in-person user studies. We find that robots, which consider the human’s point of view learn just as quickly as state-of-the-art baselines while also communicating what they have learned to the human operator. Videos of our user studies and results are available here: https://youtu.be/tC6y_jHN7Vw.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Human-Computer Interaction

Reference53 articles.

1. Apprenticeship learning via inverse reinforcement learning

2. Keyframe-based Learning from Demonstration

3. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI

4. Andrea Bajcsy, Dylan P. Losey, Marcia K. O’Malley, and Anca D. Dragan. 2018. Learning from physical human corrections, one feature at a time. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 141–149.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Active Reward Learning from Online Preferences;2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA);2023-05-29

2. Uncertainty-Resolving Questions for Social Robots;Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction;2023-03-13

3. Wrapping Haptic Displays Around Robot Arms to Communicate Learning;IEEE Transactions on Haptics;2023-01-01

4. Encouraging Human Interaction With Robot Teams: Legible and Fair Subtask Allocations;IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters;2022-07

5. Evaluation of two complementary modeling approaches for fiber-reinforced soft actuators;ROBOMECH Journal;2022-05-21

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3