Affiliation:
1. Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
2. University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, Australia
Abstract
The SARS-CoV-2 viruses and their triggered COVID-19 pandemic have fundamentally reshaped the world in almost every aspect, their evolution and influences remain. While over a million of literature have been produced on these unprecedented, overwhelming global disaster, one critical question is open: How has COVID-19 been quantified globally? This further inspires many other questions: What COVID-19 problems have been modeled? How have modeling methods in areas such as epidemiology, artificial intelligence (AI), data science, machine learning, deep learning, mathematics and social science played their roles in characterizing COVID-19? Where are the gaps and issues of these COVID-19 modeling studies? What are the lessons for quantifying future disasters? Answering these questions involves the analysis of a very broad spectrum of literature across different disciplines and domains. Distinguishing from specific efforts, this review takes the first attempt to generate a systematic, structured and contrastive landscape and taxonomy of global COVID-19 modeling. First, the surveyed problems span over a full range of COVID-19, including epidemic transmission processes, case identification and tracing, infection diagnosis and medical treatments, non-pharmaceutical interventions and their influence, drug and vaccine development, psychological, economic and social influence and impact, and misinformation, etc. Second, the reviewed modeling methods traverse all relevant disciplines, from statistic modeling to epidemic modeling, medical analysis, biomedical analysis, AI, deep and machine learning, analytics, and simulation. Critical analyses further identify significant issues and gaps, for example, simple techniques and similar problems have been overwhelmingly addressed everywhere, while intrinsic and foundational issues and deep insights have been overlooked. The review discloses significant opportunities for more deeply, effectively and uniquely quantifying COVID-19-like global disasters from their intrinsic working mechanisms, interactions and dynamics.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Reference109 articles.
1. Molecular diagnostic technologies for COVID-19: Limitations and challenges;Afzal Adeel;Journal of Advanced Research,2020
2. Jon Agley and Yunyu Xiao. 2021. Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science. BMC Public Health 21, 89 (2021).
3. Preparing for a future COVID-19 wave: insights and limitations from a data-driven evaluation of non-pharmaceutical interventions in Germany;Aravindakshan Ashwin;Scientific Reports,2020
4. Noam Barda, Dan Riesel, Amichay Akriv, Joseph Levy, Uriah Finkel, Gal Yona, Daniel Greenfeld, Shimon Sheiba, Jonathan Somer, Eitan Bachmat, Guy N Rothblum, Uri Shalit, Doron Netzer, Ran Balicer, and Noa Dagan. 2020. Developing a COVID-19 mortality risk prediction model when individual-level data are not available. Nature Communications 11, 4439 (2020), 1–9. Issue 1.
5. Conspiracy theories on Twitter: emerging motifs and temporal dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic