A Method to the Madness: Applying an Intersectional Analysis of Structural Oppression and Power in HCI and Design

Author:

Erete Sheena1ORCID,Rankin Yolanda2ORCID,Thomas Jakita3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Maryland, College Park, MD

2. Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL

3. Auburn University, Auburn, AL

Abstract

With increased focus on historically excluded populations, there have been recent calls for HCI research methods to more adequately acknowledge and address the historical context of racism, sexism, gendered racism, epistemic violence, classism, and so on. In this article, we utilize Black feminist epistemologies to serve as critical frameworks for understanding the historical context that reveals the interconnected systems of power that mutually influence one another to create unequal outcomes or social inequalities for different populations. Leveraging Black feminist thought (BFT) and intersectionality as critical social theories of design praxis, we introduce intersectional analysis of power—a method that enables HCI researchers, designers, and practitioners to identify and situate saturated sites of violence in a historical context and to transform the ways in which they engage with populations that have been historically oppressed. Engaging in self-reflection as researchers, we apply an intersectional analysis of power to co-design technologies with community street outreach workers who address violence in their predominantly Black communities. We: (1) identify the saturated site of violence; (2) identify the intersecting systems of power and who holds power (past and present); (3) describe the “conceptual glue” that binds these intersecting systems together and the assumption(s) that those who hold power are employing to guide their interactions; (4) examine the ways in which Black people are subjugated, surveilled, and/or expected to assimilate to “normative” ways of being and behaving; and (5) identify acts of resistance. This article contributes an alternative to traditional HCI and design methods that falsely perpetuate a lens of neutrality and colorblindness that centers on whiteness, innovation, and capitalism and ignores the history of State-sanctioned violence and structural oppression.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Illinois Justice Criminal Information Authority

Pritzker Pucker Family Foundation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Human-Computer Interaction

Reference157 articles.

1. Michelle Alexander. 2012. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. The New Press.

2. Decolonial Pathways: Our Manifesto for a Decolonizing Agenda in HCI Research and Design

3. Kristin Anderson-Bricker. 1999. Triple Jeopardy: Black Women and the Growth of Feminist Consciousness in SNCC 1964-1975 . New York University Press.

4. On misogynoir: citation, erasure, and plagiarism

5. April Baker-Bell. 2020. Linguistic Justice: Black Language, Literacy, Identity, and Pedagogy. Taylor and Francis, New York, NY.

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Contamination, Otherness, and Negotiating Bottom-Up Sociotechnical Imaginaries in Participatory Speculative Design;Participatory Design Conference 2024;2024-08-11

2. Building, Shifting, & Employing Power: A Taxonomy of Responses From Below to Algorithmic Harm;The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency;2024-06-03

3. Understanding Pedestrians’ Perception of Safety and Safe Mobility Practices;Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2024-05-11

4. What Counts as ‘Creative’ Work? Articulating Four Epistemic Positions in Creativity-Oriented HCI Research;Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2024-05-11

5. Unpacking Norms, Narratives, and Nourishment: A Feminist HCI Critique on Food Tracking Technologies;Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2024-05-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3