Affiliation:
1. Microelectronics and Computer technology Corp., Austin, TX
Abstract
This paper is a personal assessment of the Structured Analysis and Structured Design methods of Tom DeMarco [1] and Edward Yourdon and Larry Constantine [2]. The assessment is a reflection of my experience using Structured Analysis and Structured Design on a multi-person project during the late 1970s.Structured Analysis and Structured Design are of interest to this workshop for three reasons. First, they are well-documented instances of
methods
, one of the topics of the workshop. Second, they are in use today, thereby providing us with one view of the current state of practice. Finally, in their strengths and weaknesses, they may be representative of a class of current methods.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Reference7 articles.
1. [
1
] Tom DeMarco Structured Analysis and System Specification Yourdon Press 1978. [1] Tom DeMarco Structured Analysis and System Specification Yourdon Press 1978.
2. [
3
] J. R. Donaldson "Structured Programming " Datamation Volume 19 Number 12 December 1973. [3] J. R. Donaldson "Structured Programming " Datamation Volume 19 Number 12 December 1973.
3. Flowchart techniques for structured programming
4. [
5
] Glenford J. Myers Reliable Software Through Composite Design Petrocelli/Charter 1975. [5] Glenford J. Myers Reliable Software Through Composite Design Petrocelli/Charter 1975.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献