Affiliation:
1. University of Valencia, Spain
Abstract
Tim Berners-Lee claimed in 2001 that “the power of the Web is in its universality. Access by everyone regardless of disability is an essential aspect”. A considerable amount of work has been done to make the web accessible to those with sensory or motor disability, with an increasing number of government and enterprise intranet webs being “accessible”, and also with some consortiums and groups seriously approaching this commitment. Some authors, such as Harrysson, have already highlighted the need for a cognitively accessible web. However, in spite of good intentions, there has been little work to date that has tackled this task. At least until now, the existing WAI and NI4 recommendations about cognitive disability are extremely difficult (if not impossible) to test, as they are only general recommendations. This article explains an alternative Web that has been constructed and tested on a sample of participants with cognitive disabilities (N = 20) with positive results encouraging us to dedicate more effort to fine tune their requirements regarding specific cognitive deficits and automating the process of creating and testing cognitively accessible web content. This alternative web implies the use of a simplified web browser and an adequate web design. Discussion of the need to have several levels of cognitive accessibility, equivalent (although not identical) content for this collective and the need for testable protocols of accessibility that support these people's needs is also included. This article finishes with conclusions about the potential impact of accessible pages in the daily life of people suffering from cognitive deficits, outlining the features to be considered within a user profile specification that support cognitive difficulties and with reflections about the suitability of Semantic Web Technologies for future developments in this field.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
Human-Computer Interaction
Reference36 articles.
1. American Psychiatric Association (APA). 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV-TR 4th Ed Washington DC. American Psychiatric Association (APA). 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV-TR 4th Ed Washington DC.
2. Bambara L. M. and Koger F. 1996. Opportunities for daily choice making. Innovations 8. American Association on Mental Retardation. Bambara L. M. and Koger F. 1996. Opportunities for daily choice making. Innovations 8. American Association on Mental Retardation.
3. BALANCING THE RIGHT TO HABILITATION WITH THE RIGHT TO PERSONAL LIBERTIES: THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES TO EAT TOO MANY DOUGHNUTS AND TAKE A NAP
4. (KA)2: building ontologies for the Internet: a mid-term report
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献