Author:
Stegeman Martijn,Barendsen Erik,Smetsers Sjaak
Reference22 articles.
1. ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula. Computer science curricula 2013. Technical report, ACM Press and IEEE Computer Society Press, December 2013.
2. Katrin Becker. Grading programming assignments using rubrics.ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(3):253--253, June 2003.
3. B. W. Boehm, J. R. Brown, and M. Lipow. Quantitative evaluation of software quality. InProceedings of the 2nd. International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE '76, pages 592--605. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1976.
4. Sue Fitzgerald, Brian Hanks, Raymond Lister, Renee McCauley, and Laurie Murphy. What are we thinking when we grade programs? InProceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '13, pages 471--476. ACM, 2013.
5. R. Wayne Hamm, Kenneth D. Henderson, Jr., Marilyn L. Repsher, and Kathleen M. Timmer. A tool for program grading: The Jacksonville University scale.ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 15(1):248--252, February 1983.
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Asking Students to Refactor their Code: A Simple and Valuable Exercise;Proceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1;2024-07-03
2. Towards Comprehensive Assessment of Code Quality at CS1-Level: Tools, Rubrics and Refactoring Rules;2024 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON);2024-05-08
3. Teachers' Beliefs and Practices on the Naming of Variables in Introductory Python Programming Courses;Proceedings of the 46th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training;2024-04-14
4. Evaluating Automatically Generated Contextualised Programming Exercises;Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1;2024-03-07
5. A Literature-Informed Model for Code Style Principles to Support Teachers of Text-Based Programming;Proceedings of the 26th Australasian Computing Education Conference;2024-01-29