Fairness in Recommender Systems: Evaluation Approaches and Assurance Strategies

Author:

Wu Yao1ORCID,Cao Jian1ORCID,Xu Guandong2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

2. University of Technology Sydney, Australia

Abstract

With the wide application of recommender systems, the potential impacts of recommender systems on customers, item providers and other parties have attracted increasing attention. Fairness, which is the quality of treating people equally, is also becoming important in recommender system evaluation and algorithm design. Therefore, in the past years, there has been a growing interest in fairness measurement and assurance in recommender systems. Although there are several reviews on related topics, such as fairness in machine learning and debias in recommender systems, they do not present a systematic view on fairness in recommender systems, which is context aware and has a multi-sided meaning. Therefore, in this review, the concept of fairness is discussed in detail in the various contexts of recommender systems. Specifically, a comprehensive framework to classify fairness metrics is proposed from four dimensions, i.e.,Fairness for Whom,Demographic Unit,Time Frame, andQuantification Method. Then the strategies for eliminating unfairness in recommendations, fairness in different recommendation tasks and datasets are reviewed and summarized. Finally, the challenges and future work are discussed.

Funder

Program of Technology Innovation of the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality

China National Science Foundation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

General Computer Science

Reference152 articles.

1. Fabian Abel, Yashar Deldjoo, Mehdi Elahi, and Daniel Kohlsdorf. 2017. Recsys challenge 2017: Offline and online evaluation. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 372–373.

2. Improving aggregate recommendation diversity using ranking-based techniques;Adomavicius Gediminas;IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.,2011

3. Context-aware target apps selection and recommendation for enhancing personal mobile assistants;Aliannejadi Mohammad;ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.,2021

4. What is the point of equality?;Anderson Elizabeth S.;Ethics,1999

5. Fairness metrics and bias mitigation strategies for rating predictions;Ashokan Ashwathy;Inf. Process. Manage.,2021

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3