Argumentation Structure Prediction in CJEU Decisions on Fiscal State Aid

Author:

Santin Piera1ORCID,Grundler Giulia2ORCID,Galassi Andrea2ORCID,Galli Federico1ORCID,Lagioia Francesca3ORCID,Palmieri Elena2ORCID,Ruggeri Federico2ORCID,Sartor Giovanni4ORCID,Torroni Paolo2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Alma AI, University of Bologna, Italy

2. DISI, University of Bologna, Italy

3. Alma AI, University of Bologna European University Institute Italy

4. Alma AI, University of Bologna, European University Institute, Italy

Funder

European Commission NextGeneration EU programme

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

European Union's Justice Programme (2014-2020)

Italian Ministry of Education and Research

Publisher

ACM

Reference53 articles.

1. Kevin D. Ashley , Ravi Desai , and John M . Levine . 2002 . Teaching Case-Based Argumentation Concepts Using Dialectic Arguments vs. Didactic Explanations. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems . 585--595. Kevin D. Ashley, Ravi Desai, and John M. Levine. 2002. Teaching Case-Based Argumentation Concepts Using Dialectic Arguments vs. Didactic Explanations. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems. 585--595.

2. Katie Atkinson and Trevor J. M . Bench-Capon . 2019 . Reasoning with Legal Cases : Analogy or Rule Application?. In ICAIL. ACM , 12--21. Katie Atkinson and Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon. 2019. Reasoning with Legal Cases: Analogy or Rule Application?. In ICAIL. ACM, 12--21.

3. Argumentation schemes in AI and Law

4. Roy Bar-Haim Indrajit Bhattacharya Francesco Dinuzzo Amrita Saha and Noam Slonim. 2017. Stance classification of context-dependent claims. In EACL. 251--261. Roy Bar-Haim Indrajit Bhattacharya Francesco Dinuzzo Amrita Saha and Noam Slonim. 2017. Stance classification of context-dependent claims. In EACL. 251--261.

5. Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon , James B. Freeman , Hanns Hohmann , and Henry Prakken . 2004. Computational Models, Argumentation Theories and Legal Practice . In Argumentation Machines. Vol. 9 . Springer , 85--120. Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, James B. Freeman, Hanns Hohmann, and Henry Prakken. 2004. Computational Models, Argumentation Theories and Legal Practice. In Argumentation Machines. Vol. 9. Springer, 85--120.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3