Abstract
AbstractWe live in exciting times for AI and Law: technical developments are moving at a breakneck pace, and at the same time, the call for more robust AI governance and regulation grows stronger. How should we as an AI & Law community navigate these dramatic developments and claims? In this Presidential Address, I present my ideas for a way forward: researching, developing and evaluating real AI systems for the legal field with researchers from AI, Law and beyond. I will demonstrate how we at the Netherlands National Police Lab AI are developing responsible AI by combining insights from different disciplines, and how this connects to the future of our field.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference76 articles.
1. Aleven V, Ashley KD (1997) Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples: empirical evaluation of an intelligent learning environment. Artif Intell Educ 39:87–94
2. Alikhademi K, Drobina E, Prioleau D, Richardson B, Purves D, Gilbert JE (2022) A review of predictive policing from the perspective of fairness. Artif Intell Law, 1–17
3. Almada M (2019) Human intervention in automated decision-making: toward the construction of contestable systems. Proc Seventeenth Int Conf Artif Intell Law 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322640.3326699
4. Amnesty International (2020) We sense trouble: Automated discrimination and mass surveillance in predictive policing in the Netherlands. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur35/2971/2020/en/
5. Angwin J, Larson J, Mattu S, Kirchner L (2022) Machine bias. Ethics of data and analytics. Auerbach, pp 254–264