A Survey of Practical Formal Methods for Security

Author:

Kulik Tomas1ORCID,Dongol Brijesh2ORCID,Larsen Peter Gorm1,Macedo Hugo Daniel1,Schneider Steve3,Tran-Jørgensen Peter W. V.4,Woodcock James5

Affiliation:

1. Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

2. University of Surrey, Surrey, United Kingdom

3. University of Surrey, Denmark

4. Bank Data, Aarhus, Denmark

5. University of York, Aarhus University, York, Aarhus, United Kingdom, Denmark

Abstract

In today’s world, critical infrastructure is often controlled by computing systems. This introduces new risks for cyber attacks, which can compromise the security and disrupt the functionality of these systems. It is therefore necessary to build such systems with strong guarantees of resiliency against cyber attacks. One way to achieve this level of assurance is using formal verification, which provides proofs of system compliance with desired cyber security properties. The use of Formal Methods (FM) in aspects of cyber security and safety-critical systems are reviewed in this article. We split FM into the three main classes: theorem proving, model checking, and lightweight FM. To allow the different uses of FM to be compared, we define a common set of terms. We further develop categories based on the type of computing system FM are applied in. Solutions in each class and category are presented, discussed, compared, and summarised. We describe historical highlights and developments and present a state-of-the-art review in the area of FM in cyber security. This review is presented from the point of view of FM practitioners and researchers, commenting on the trends in each of the classes and categories. This is achieved by considering all types of FM, several types of security and safety-critical systems, and by structuring the taxonomy accordingly. The article hence provides a comprehensive overview of FM and techniques available to system designers of security-critical systems, simplifying the process of choosing the right tool for the task. The article concludes by summarising the discussion of the review, focusing on best practices, challenges, general future trends, and directions of research within this field.

Funder

Manufacturing Academy of Denmark

FaCT: Faithful Composition of Trust

ARC Discovery

Steve Schneider

Poul Due Jensen Foundation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Theoretical Computer Science,Software

Reference273 articles.

1. Jasper RTL Apps. 2020. Cadence IFV Model Checker. Retrieved from www.cadence.com/en_US/home/tools/system-design-and-verification/formal-and-static-verification/jasper-gold-verification-platform.html.

2. Fides Aarts, Joeri De Ruiter, and Erik Poll. 2013. Formal models of bank cards for free. In IEEE 6th International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops. IEEE, 461–468.

3. Formal Verification of Gate-Level Multiple Side Channel Parameters to Detect Hardware Trojans

4. Modeling in Event-B

5. S. Abughazalah, K. Markantonakis, and K. Mayes. 2014. Secure mobile payment on NFC-enabled mobile phones formally analysed using CasperFDR. In IEEE 13th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications. IEEE, 422–431.

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3