Improving Automated Detection of FOIA Deliberative Process Privilege Content

Author:

Giannella Chris R.1ORCID,Branting Luther Karl1ORCID,Van Guilder James A.1ORCID,Baron Jason R.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The MITRE Corporation, McLean, USA

2. University of Maryland, College Park, USA

Abstract

We address the problem of automatically detecting text that meets the deliberative process privilege as defined by the U.S. Freedom of Information Act. A recent study in the ACM J. Comput. Cult. Herit. describes an effort to create an annotated corpus wherein each paragraph was manually labeled as to whether it met this privilege. The authors tested Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression classifiers using simple word-count-based features. We implement these classifiers as well as expanded versions of them resulting from the inclusion of more linguistically complex features. After removal of certain elements of the original corpus, we carry out experiments and observe a significant increase in classifier correctness when these features are used in conjunction with simple word-count-based features. We also implement a BERT-based classifier and observe a further improvement.

Funder

MITRE’s Independent Research and Development Program

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference21 articles.

1. Stefano Baccianella, Andrea Esuli, and Fabrizio Sebastiani. 2010. SentiWordNet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC). European Language Resources Association, 2200–2204.

2. Jason R. Baron, Nathaniel W. Rollings, and Douglas W. Oard. 2023. Using ChatGPT for the FOIA exemption 5 deliberative process privilege. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Assistance for Legal Professionals in the Digital Workplace held in conjunction with the 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL) (LegalAIIA), Vol. Vol-3423. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 32–48.

3. Providing More Efficient Access to Government Records: A Use Case Involving Application of Machine Learning to Improve FOIA Review for the Deliberative Process Privilege

4. The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation;Chicco Davide;BMC Genomics,2020

5. W. J. Conover. 1999. Practical Nonparametric Statistics (3rd Ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, New York.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3