Providing More Efficient Access to Government Records: A Use Case Involving Application of Machine Learning to Improve FOIA Review for the Deliberative Process Privilege

Author:

Baron Jason R.1,Sayed Mahmoud F.1,Oard Douglas W.1

Affiliation:

1. University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

Abstract

At present, the review process for material that is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in the United States of America, and under many similar government transparency regimes worldwide, is entirely manual. Public access to the records of their government is thus inhibited by the long backlogs of material awaiting such reviews. This article studies one aspect of that problem by first creating a new public test collection with annotations for one class of exempt material subject to the deliberative process privilege, and then by using that test collection to study the ability of current text classification techniques to identify those materials that are exempt from release under that privilege. Results show that when the system is trained and evaluated using annotations from the same reviewer, even difficult cases can often be reliably detected. However, results also show that differences in reviewer interpretations, differences in record custodians, and differences in topics of the records used for training and testing can pose challenges.

Funder

NSF

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems,Conservation

Reference42 articles.

1. Jason R. Baron, David D. Lewis, and Douglas W. Oard. 2006. TREC 2006 legal track overview. In Proceedings of the 15th Text Retrieval Conference. NIST Special Publication 500-272.

2. Opening up dark digital archives through the use of analytics to identify sensitive content

3. Autonomy and reliability of continuous active learning for technology-assisted review;Cormack Gordon V.;arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.06868,2015

4. Navigating Imprecision in Relevance Assessments on the Road to Total Recall

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3