Using Collection Shards to Study Retrieval Performance Effect Sizes

Author:

Ferro Nicola1ORCID,Kim Yubin2,Sanderson Mark3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Padua, Padova (PD), Italy

2. UPMC Enterprises, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

3. RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

Despite the bulk of research studying how to more accurately compare the performance of IR systems, less attention is devoted to better understanding the different factors that play a role in such performance and how they interact. This is the case of shards, i.e., partitioning a document collection into sub-parts, which are used for many different purposes, ranging from efficiency to selective search or making test collection evaluation more accurate. In all these cases, there is empirical knowledge supporting the importance of shards, but we lack actual models that allow us to measure the impact of shards on system performance and how they interact with topics and systems. We use the general linear mixed model framework and present a model that encompasses the experimental factors of system, topic, shard, and their interaction effects. This detailed model allows us to more accurately estimate differences between the effect of various factors. We study shards created by a range of methods used in prior work and better explain observations noted in prior work in a principled setting and offer new insights. Notably, we discover that the topic*shard interaction effect, in particular, is a large effect almost globally across all datasets, an observation that, to our knowledge, has not been measured before.

Funder

Australian Research Council

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Science Applications,General Business, Management and Accounting,Information Systems

Reference65 articles.

1. Research Frontiers in Information Retrieval

2. J. A. Aslam E. Yilmaz and V. Pavlu. 2005. A geometric interpretation of r-precision and its correlation with average precision See Reference Baeza-Yates et al. {4} 573--574. 10.1145/1076034.1076134 J. A. Aslam E. Yilmaz and V. Pavlu. 2005. A geometric interpretation of r-precision and its correlation with average precision See Reference Baeza-Yates et al. {4} 573--574. 10.1145/1076034.1076134

3. J. A. Aslam E. Yilmaz and V. Pavlu. 2005. The maximum entropy method for analyzing retrieval measures See Reference Baeza-Yates et al. {4} 27--34. 10.1145/1076034.1076042 J. A. Aslam E. Yilmaz and V. Pavlu. 2005. The maximum entropy method for analyzing retrieval measures See Reference Baeza-Yates et al. {4} 27--34. 10.1145/1076034.1076042

4. Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval - SIGIR '05

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How Many Crowd Workers Do I Need? On Statistical Power when Crowdsourcing Relevance Judgments;ACM Transactions on Information Systems;2023-08-18

2. The Impact of Judgment Variability on the Consistency of Offline Effectiveness Measures;ACM Transactions on Information Systems;2023-08-18

3. Predicting Retrieval Performance Changes in Evolving Evaluation Environments;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2023

4. Detecting Significant Differences Between Information Retrieval Systems via Generalized Linear Models;Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management;2022-10-17

5. Where Do Queries Come From?;Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval;2022-07-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3