InfoSec Process Action Model (IPAM)

Author:

Curry Michael1,Marshall Byron2,Crossler Robert E.1,Correia John1

Affiliation:

1. Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA

2. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA

Abstract

While much of the extant InfoSec research relies on single assessment models that predict intent to act, this article proposes a multi-stage InfoSec Process Action Model (IPAM) that can positively change individual InfoSec behavior. We believe that this model will allow InfoSec researchers to focus more directly on the process that leads to action and develop better interventions that address problematic security behaviors. Building on successful healthcare efforts that resulted in smoking cessation, regular exercise, and a healthier diet, among others, IPAM is a hybrid predictive process approach to behavioral InfoSec improvement. IPAM formulates the motivational antecedents of intent as separate from the volitional drivers of behavior. Singular fear appeals often seen in InfoSec research are replaced by more nuanced treatments appropriately differentiated to support behavioral change as part of a process; phase-appropriate measures of self-efficacy are employed to more precisely assess the likelihood that a participant will act on good intentions; and decisional balance assessment of pro and con perceptions is monitored over time. These notions better align InfoSec research with both leading security practice and successful comparators in healthcare. We believe IPAM can both help InfoSec research models better explain actual behavior and better inform practical security behavior improvement initiatives.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Management Information Systems

Reference82 articles.

1. When planning is not enough: Fighting unhealthy snacking habits by mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII)

2. The theory of planned behavior

3. Explaining the Discrepancy between Intentions and Actions: The Case of Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation

4. Ajzen I. &Fishbein M. (1975). Belief attitude intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley. Ajzen I. &Fishbein M. (1975). Belief attitude intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.

5. Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3