Checkpointing Workflows à la Young/Daly Is Not Good Enough

Author:

Benoit Anne1ORCID,Perotin Luca1ORCID,Robert Yves1ORCID,Sun Hongyang2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Laboratoire LIP, ENS Lyon, Lyon Cedex 07, France

2. University of Kansas, KS, USA

Abstract

This article revisits checkpointing strategies when workflows composed of multiple tasks execute on a parallel platform. The objective is to minimize the expectation of the total execution time. For a single task, the Young/Daly formula provides the optimal checkpointing period. However, when many tasks execute simultaneously, the risk that one of them is severely delayed increases with the number of tasks. To mitigate this risk, a possibility is to checkpoint each task more often than with the Young/Daly strategy. But is it worth slowing each task down with extra checkpoints? Does the extra checkpointing make a difference globally? This article answers these questions. On the theoretical side, we prove several negative results for keeping the Young/Daly period when many tasks execute concurrently, and we design novel checkpointing strategies that guarantee an efficient execution with high probability. On the practical side, we report comprehensive experiments that demonstrate the need to go beyond the Young/Daly period and to checkpoint more often for a wide range of application/platform settings.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computational Theory and Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Hardware and Architecture,Modeling and Simulation,Software

Reference38 articles.

1. Anne Benoit Lucas Perotin Yves Robert and Hongyang Sun. 2021. Checkpointing Workflows à la Young/Daly Is Not Good Enough: Code for In-house Simulator. (June2021). https://graal.ens-lyon.fr/yrobert/simulator.zip.

2. Argonne Leadership Computing Facility (ALCF). Mira Log Traces. Retrieved from https://reports.alcf.anl.gov/data/mira.html.

3. Scientific workflows: Past, present and future

4. Scheduling computational workflows on failure-prone platforms;Aupy Guillaume;Int. J. Netw. Comput.,2016

5. Assessing General-Purpose Algorithms to Cope with Fail-Stop and Silent Errors

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Survey of Graph Comparison Methods with Applications to Nondeterminism in High-Performance Computing;The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications;2023-04-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3