Psychometrics in Behavioral Software Engineering: A Methodological Introduction with Guidelines

Author:

Graziotin Daniel1,Lenberg Per2,Feldt Robert2,Wagner Stefan1

Affiliation:

1. University of Stuttgart, Institute of Software Engineering, Stuttgart, Germany

2. Chalmers and the University of Gothenburg, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Gothenbug, Sweden

Abstract

A meaningful and deep understanding of the human aspects of software engineering (SE) requires psychological constructs to be considered. Psychology theory can facilitate the systematic and sound development as well as the adoption of instruments (e.g., psychological tests, questionnaires) to assess these constructs. In particular, to ensure high quality, the psychometric properties of instruments need evaluation. In this article, we provide an introduction to psychometric theory for the evaluation of measurement instruments for SE researchers. We present guidelines that enable using existing instruments and developing new ones adequately. We conducted a comprehensive review of the psychology literature framed by the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. We detail activities used when operationalizing new psychological constructs, such as item pooling, item review, pilot testing, item analysis, factor analysis, statistical property of items, reliability, validity, and fairness in testing and test bias. We provide an openly available example of a psychometric evaluation based on our guideline. We hope to encourage a culture change in SE research towards the adoption of established methods from psychology. To improve the quality of behavioral research in SE, studies focusing on introducing, validating, and then using psychometric instruments need to be more common.

Funder

Swedish Armed Forces

Swedish Defense Materiel Administration

Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems

Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation

Alexander von Humboldt (AvH) Foundation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Software

Reference146 articles.

1. Likert or Rasch? Nothing is more applicable than good theory

2. Anne Anastasi and Susana Urbina. 1997. Psychological Testing. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ. Anne Anastasi and Susana Urbina. 1997. Psychological Testing. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River NJ.

3. Heterogeneous factor analysis models: A bayesian approach

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. “We do not appreciate being experimented on”: Developer and researcher views on the ethics of experiments on open-source projects;Journal of Systems and Software;2023-10

2. Qualitative software engineering research: Reflections and guidelines;Journal of Software: Evolution and Process;2023-09-12

3. Psychometric instruments in software engineering research on personality: Status quo after fifty years;Journal of Systems and Software;2023-09

4. Psychological Aspects of Pair Programming;Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering;2023-06-14

5. Investigating acceptance behavior in software engineering—Theoretical perspectives;Journal of Systems and Software;2023-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3