Interpersonal Conflicts During Code Review

Author:

Wurzel Gonçalves Pavlína1,Çalikli Gül2,Bacchelli Alberto1

Affiliation:

1. University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

2. University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom

Abstract

Code review consists of manual inspection, discussion, and judgment of source code by developers other than the code's author. Due to discussions around competing ideas and group decision-making processes, interpersonal conflicts during code reviews are expected. This study systematically investigates how developers perceive code review conflicts and addresses interpersonal conflicts during code reviews as a theoretical construct. Through the thematic analysis of interviews conducted with 22 developers, we confirm that conflicts during code reviews are commonplace, anticipated and seen as normal by developers. Even though conflicts do happen and carry a negative impact for the review, conflicts-if resolved constructively-can also create value and bring improvement. Moreover, the analysis provided insights on how strongly conflicts during code review and its context (i.e., code, developer, team, organization) are intertwined. Finally, there are aspects specific to code review conflicts that call for the research and application of customized conflict resolution and management techniques, some of which are discussed in this paper. Preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.05425 Data and material: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5848794

Funder

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Furderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference85 articles.

1. 2021. https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-pull-requests title = GitHub Docs: Collaborating with Pull Requests. 2021. https://docs.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-pull-requests title = GitHub Docs: Collaborating with Pull Requests.

2. 2021. Atlassian Crucible: Collaborative Code Review. https://www.atlassian.com/software/crucible. 2021. Atlassian Crucible: Collaborative Code Review. https://www.atlassian.com/software/crucible.

3. 2021. Gerrit Code Review. https://www.gerritcodereview.com/. 2021. Gerrit Code Review. https://www.gerritcodereview.com/.

4. 2021. Phabricator. https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/introduction/. 2021. Phabricator. https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/introduction/.

5. Software inspections: an effective verification process

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Emotion Analysis in Software Ecosystems;Software Ecosystems;2023

2. Interpersonal Conflicts During Code Review;Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction;2022-03-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3