Methodological Middle Spaces: Addressing the Need for Methodological Innovation to Achieve Simultaneous Realism, Control, and Scalability in Experimental Studies of AI-Mediated Communication

Author:

Aghajari Zhila1ORCID,Baumer Eric P. S.1ORCID,Hohenstein Jess2ORCID,Jung Malte F.2ORCID,DiFranzo Dominic1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA

2. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

Abstract

As AI-mediated communication (AI-MC) becomes more prevalent in everyday interactions, it becomes increasingly important to develop a rigorous understanding of its effects on interpersonal relationships and on society at large. Controlled experimental studies offer a key means of developing such an understanding, but various complexities make it difficult for experimental AI-MC research to simultaneously achieve the criteria of experimental realism, experimental control, and scalability. After outlining these methodological challenges, this paper offers the concept of methodological middle spaces as a means to address these challenges. This concept suggests that the key to simultaneously achieving all three of these criteria is to abandon the perfect attainment of any single criterion. This concept's utility is demonstrated via its use to guide the design of a platform for conducting text-based AI-MC experiments. Through a series of three example studies, the paper illustrates how the concept of methodological middle spaces can inform the design of specific experimental methods. Doing so enabled these studies to examine research questions that would have been either difficult or impossible to investigate using existing approaches. The paper concludes by describing how future research could similarly apply the concept of methodological middle spaces to expand methodological possibilities for AI-MC research in ways that enable contributions not currently possible.

Funder

the US Army Research Lab

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference93 articles.

1. What Can We Learn from Experiments? Understanding the Threats to the Scalability of Experimental Results

2. The Adventures of Older Authors

3. Kenneth C Arnold Krysta Chauncey and Krzysztof Z Gajos. 2018. Sentiment Bias in Predictive Text Recommendations Results in Biased Writing.. In Graphics Interface. 42--49. Kenneth C Arnold Krysta Chauncey and Krzysztof Z Gajos. 2018. Sentiment Bias in Predictive Text Recommendations Results in Biased Writing.. In Graphics Interface. 42--49.

4. Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness.

5. Elliot Aronson , Marylinn B. Brewer , and J. Merrill Carlsmith . 1985. Experimentation in Social Psychology . In Handbook of Social Psychology third edition ed.). Random House , New York , 441--486. Elliot Aronson, Marylinn B. Brewer, and J. Merrill Carlsmith. 1985. Experimentation in Social Psychology. In Handbook of Social Psychology third edition ed.). Random House, New York, 441--486.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Tricky vs. Transparent: Towards an Ecologically Valid and Safe Approach for Evaluating Online Safety Nudges for Teens;Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2024-05-11

2. What’s the Norm Around Here? Individuals’ Responses Can Mitigate the Effects of Misinformation Prevalence in Shaping Perceptions of a Community;Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2023-04-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3