An International Comparison of K-12 Computer Science Education Intended and Enacted Curricula-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

An International Comparison of K-12 Computer Science Education Intended and Enacted Curricula

Published:2019-11-21 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:
Container-title:Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Falkner Katrina¹,Sentance Sue²,Vivian Rebecca¹,Barksdale Sarah³,Busuttil Leonard⁴,Cole Elizabeth⁵,Liebe Christine⁶,Maiorana Francesco⁷,McGill Monica M.⁸,Quille Keith⁹

Affiliation:

1. School of Computer Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

2. Raspberry Pi Foundation Cambridge, England, UK

3. Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

4. Department of Technology and Entrepreneurship, Education University of Malta Msida, Malta

5. School of Computer Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

6. Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, USA

7. Department of Computer Science, Kansas State University, Kansas, Manhattan, USA

8. Department of Computer Science, Knox College Galesburg, Illinois, USA

9. Department of Computing, TU Dublin, Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland

Publisher

ACM

Link

https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3364510.3364517

Reference59 articles.

1. J Ainley and R Carstens. 2018. Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 Conceptual Framework. (2018) 2018 pages. https://doi.org/10.1787/799337c2-en J Ainley and R Carstens. 2018. Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 Conceptual Framework. (2018) 2018 pages. https://doi.org/10.1787/799337c2-en

2. John Ainley and Ralph Carstens. 2018. Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 Conceptual Framework. 187 (2018). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/799337c2-en John Ainley and Ralph Carstens. 2018. Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 Conceptual Framework. 187 (2018). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/799337c2-en

3. Mansour M. Al-Sulaiman. 1999. A Computing Curriculum for Technical High Schools in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 11 (Jan. 1999) 85--104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1319-1578(99)80005-6 Mansour M. Al-Sulaiman. 1999. A Computing Curriculum for Technical High Schools in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 11 (Jan. 1999) 85--104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1319-1578(99)80005-6

4. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). 2015. Australian Curriculum: Digital Technologies. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). 2015. Australian Curriculum: Digital Technologies. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/.

5. A. Bandura. 2006. Guide for Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales. Age Information Publishing Greenwich. 307--337 pages. A. Bandura. 2006. Guide for Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales. Age Information Publishing Greenwich. 307--337 pages.

Cited by 42 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Observing Students' Behavior During Problem Solving: Determinants of Success;Proceedings of the 19th WiPSCE Conference on Primary and Secondary Computing Education Research;2024-09-16

2. Voices of Elementary Computer Science Teachers: Computer Science Integration Rationales and Practices;ACM Transactions on Computing Education;2024-08-16

3. Equitable Access to Cybersecurity Education: A Case Study of Underserved Middle School Students;Proceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1;2024-07-03

4. Posicionando a BNCC Computação: uma Comparação com Documentos Curriculares Internacionais;Anais do IV Simpósio Brasileiro de Educação em Computação (EDUCOMP 2024);2024-04-22

5. Champion, Collaborator, Curator, Anchor: Supporting K-12 Teachers to Integrate Computational Thinking;Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2;2024-03-14