Affiliation:
1. Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI
2. College of Charleston, Charleston, SC
3. Pacific Lutheran University, Tacoma, WA
Abstract
Student-centered instructional practices structure a class so that students interact with each other, engage deeply with the content, and receive formative feedback. These evidence-based practices benefit all students but are particularly effective with underrepresented learners, including women and members of other minority groups. To what extent have computer science (CS) faculty embraced these strategies? We surveyed over 700 U.S. faculty to find out. Results suggest that female faculty, associate professors, and those teaching courses with enrollment above 80 students are more likely to use these student-centered practices. Across all responses, 20% of faculty use student--student interaction on a regular basis during class. In contrast, 38% of faculty rely on lectures for content delivery. Results were also compared with published data for other academic disciplines. CS faculty are less likely to use these practices compared to their non-STEM colleagues but more likely to use these practices compared to other STEM discipline faculty. Overall, CS faculty have adopted student-centered practices to some degree, but our community should strive for higher adoption rates to help as many students as possible learn and remain in computer science.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
Education,General Computer Science
Reference46 articles.
1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 2013. Measuring STEM teaching practices: A report from a national meeting on the measurement of undergraduate Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) teaching. Washington DC. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 2013. Measuring STEM teaching practices: A report from a national meeting on the measurement of undergraduate Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) teaching. Washington DC.
2. Cooperative learning instructional methods for CS1
3. Paul Black and Dylan William. 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy 8 Practice 5 1 7--74. Paul Black and Dylan William. 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy 8 Practice 5 1 7--74.
4. Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Is there anybody out there? Educator perception of student social presence and engagement in the zoomosphere;Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning;2024-02-27
2. An Exploratory Study of Professional Issues Based on the Pain Points of Teaching Modular Projects;Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences;2024-01-01
3. Multi-Institutional Multi-National Studies of Parsons Problems;Proceedings of the 2023 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education;2023-12-22
4. How Do I Get People to Use My Ideas?;Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1;2023-03-02
5. Improving Interactive Instruction: Faculty Engagement Requires Starting Small and Telling All;Koli Calling '22: 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research;2022-11-17