Author:
Rackwitz Maike,Hustedt Thurid,Hammerschmid Gerhard
Abstract
To unlock the full potential of ICT-related public sector innovation and digital transformation, governments must embrace collaborative working structures and leadership, is commonly argued. However, little is known about the dynamics of such collaborations in contexts of hierarchy, silo cultures, and procedural accountability. A widely voiced but empirically insufficiently substantiated claim is that bringing cross-cutting digital endeavours forward requires more lateral, network-based approaches to governance beyond traditional Weberian ideals. We test this claim by shedding light on three distinct challenges (complexity, risk, and power imbalance) encountered when implementing the specific collaborative case of the German Online Access Act (OAA) and by examining how they have been addressed in institutional design and leadership. Our analysis, which combines desk research and semi-structured expert interviews, reveals that flexible, horizontal approaches are on the rise. Taking a closer look, however, vertical coordination continues to serve as complementary means to problem-solving capability.
Publisher
Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH
Reference61 articles.
1. Ansell, Chris, & Gash, Alison (2007). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18 (4), 543-571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
2. Bommert, Ben (2010). Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. International Public Management Review, 11 (1), 16-33. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316105337.006.
3. Breaugh, Jessica, Hammerschmid, Gerhard, Rackwitz, Maike, & Palaric, Enora (2020). Collaborative management for ICT enabled public sector innovation. TROPICO EU Research report. Retrieved from https://tropico-project.eu/download/d6-4-research-report-on-collaborative-management-for-ict-enabled-public-sector-innovation/?wpdmdl=1571&refresh=5fe05d7e319611608539518 [12th October, 2020].
4. Chen, Yu-Che, & Lee, Johoo (2018). Collaborative data networks for public service: governance, management, and performance. Public Management Review, 20 (5), 672-690. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1305691.
5. Choi, Taehyon, & Robertson, Peter J. (2013). Deliberation and Decision in Collaborative Governance: A Simulation of Approaches to Mitigate Power Imbalance. Journal of Public Administration and Research, 24 (2), 495-518. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut003.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Krause, Tobias A., Schachtner, Christian & Thapa, Basanta E. P. (Hrsg.) (2023). Handbuch Digitalisierung der Verwaltung. transcript Verlag. 420 Seiten. ISBN: 978-3-8252-5929-7 / ISBN: 978-3-8385-5929-2 (eBook). https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838559292.;dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management;2024-07-08
2. Koordinationsherausforderungen der Digitalisierung in der Kommunalverwaltung – Eine empirische Exploration am Beispiel der Stadt Ludwigsburg;dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management;2024-07-08
3. Towards a platformised welfare state? How public administration, personal data, and third-sector welfare get entangled in a nation-wide digitalisation project;dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management;2024-07-08
4. Coproduction, public sector innovation and governance: a systematic literature review;International Journal of Innovation Science;2024-01-19
5. Intergovernmental Relations in Digitalization Policy: German Tax Administration Between Centralization and Decentralization;Palgrave Studies in Sub-National Governance;2024