Intergovernmental Relations in Digitalization Policy: German Tax Administration Between Centralization and Decentralization

Author:

Wehmeier Liz Marla

Abstract

AbstractDespite the high hopes associated with public sector digitalization, especially in times of crisis, it does not yet hold up to its potential. Both the negotiation and implementation of digitalization policy presents a challenge for all levels of government, requiring extensive coordination efforts. In general, there are conflicting views if more centralized or decentralized policy processes are more effective for coordination—a tension further exacerbated in the context of digitalization policy within multilevel systems, where the imperative of standardization collides with decentralization forces inherent in federalism.Based on the analysis of expert interviews (n = 29), this chapter examines how digitalization policy in the context of the German federal intergovernmental relations context is located and negotiated, and how this relates to local policy implementation. Focusing on the decentralized German tax administration as a case study, the analysis reveals a shift from a conflicted to a multi-layered policy process, underpinned by a mechanism of “concentration without centralization.” Strategic and operational competencies are bundled in an institutionalized and legally regulated network for digitalization to achieve necessary standardization of digital infrastructure. Furthermore, the research emphasizes the influence of intergovernmental relations on local implementation and the associated challenges and opportunities.

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Reference42 articles.

1. Bayerisches Landesamt für Steuern. (n.d.). ELSTER, eine Erfolgsstory. Elster. https://www.elster.de/eportal/infoseite/elster_eine_erfolgsstory. Accessed 1 August 2023.

2. Behnke, N., & Kropp, S. (2021). Administrative federalism. In S. Kuhlmann, I. Proeller, D. Schimanke, & J. Ziekow (Eds.), Public administration in Germany (pp. 35–51). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53697-8_3

3. Bergström, T., Kuhlmann, S., Laffin, M., & Wayenberg, E. (2022). Special issue on comparative intergovernmental relations and the pandemic: How European devolved governments responded to a public health crisis. Local Government Studies, 48(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2022.2039636

4. Bundesministerium des Innern und für Heimat. (2016, December 14). Durchbruch für ein modernes E-Government in Deutschland. http://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/pressemitteilungen/DE/2016/12/buergerportal.html;jsessionid=D94E532BA5B382C35140D31D53B21BF7.2_cid295?nn=9390260. Accessed 12 April 2023.

5. Bundesregierung. Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Änderung des Onlinezugangsgesetzes sowie weiterer Vorschriften zur Digitalisierung der Verwaltung (OZG-Änderungsgesetz – OZGÄndG). Pub. L. No. Drucksache 20/8093 (2023).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3