Author:
Pinto Avilez Ariadna,Díaz Larenas Claudio
Abstract
This paper presents an action research study conducted in an English communicative course at a Chilean university. This investigation aimed to improve university students' speaking skills through the self-assessment methodology. The intervention was held during four weeks, in which participants were exposed to English through task-based lessons that required their systematic self-assessment to develop their speaking skills. With the use of an analytic rubric to measure whether or not there was improvement in pre and post oral interviews, a learning journal and a focus group interview, findings showed that there was a positive change in their speaking performances, and learners appreciated this methodology as a way to improve their academic results.
Publisher
Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Sociology and Political Science
Reference28 articles.
1. Bound, D. & Falchikov, N. (1989). “Quantitative Studies of Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Critical Analysis of Findings”. Higher Education, 18(5), pp. 529-49. doi: 10.1007/BF00138746
2. Burns, A. (2011). “Action Research in the Field of Second Language Teaching and Learning”, in E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Vol II (pp. 237-253). New York: Routledge.
3. Brew, A. (1999). “Towards Autonomous Assessment: Using Self-assessment and Peer Assessment”, in Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches, ed. S. Brown and A. Glasner, 159-71.
4. Doqaruni, V., Rahmani, G., Behzad, P. (2017). “Reza: A Mixed Methods Research on Teachers’ Beliefs about Action Research in Second Language Education”. International Journal of Action Research, 13(1), pp. 75-94. doi: 10.3224/ijar.v13i1.06
5. Elwood, J. & Klenowski, V. (2002). “Creating Communities of Shared Practice: The Challenges of Assessment Use in Learning and Teaching”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(3), pp. 243-256. doi: 10.1080/02602930220138606