Abstract
This paper explores the nature and use of “Rose’s Gloss” for ethnographic research. Rose’s Gloss is a technique – credited to Edward Rose, late of the University of Colorado at Boulder – for eliciting information from members of society without imposing methodologically ironic categories onto members’ responses. This facilitates what Rose called “natural” (people’s own) rather than “professional” (stipulative) sociology, which is the distinctive feature of the “Ethno-Inquiries” approach to social research that he pioneered. A pilgrimage to Jerusalem provided unexpected opportunities to document the worded nature of social life. The pilgrimage demonstrates how Rose’s Gloss can be used as an ethnographic practice to pass as a competent participant in study sites.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Lodzki (University of Lodz)
Reference40 articles.
1. Becker, Howard S. (1986) Writing for Social Scientists. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
2. Birdwhistell, Ray L. (1968) “Review of A Looking-Glass Conversation in the Rare Languages of Sez and Pique by E. Rose.” American Anthropologist 70:830.
3. Carlin, Andrew P. (1999) “The works of Edward Rose: A bibliography.” Ethnographic Studies 4:61-77.
4. Carlin, Andrew P. (2002a) “Biography and bibliography: An intellectual profile of Edward Rose.” Auto/Biography: A British Sociological Association Study Group Journal 10(1&2):41-54.
5. Carlin, Andrew P. (2002b) “Methodological irony and media analysis: On textual presentations in the work of theorising.” Pretexts: Literary and Cultural Studies 11(1):41-55.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献