Author:
,Naegeli Hanspeter,Birch Andrew Nicholas,Casacuberta Josep,De Schrijver Adinda,Gralak Mikołaj Antoni,Guerche Philippe,Jones Huw,Manachini Barbara,Messéan Antoine,Nielsen Elsa Ebbesen,Nogué Fabien,Robaglia Christophe,Rostoks Nils,Sweet Jeremy,Tebbe Christoph,Visioli Francesco,Wal Jean‐Michel,Álvarez Fernando,Lanzoni Anna,Paraskevopoulos Konstantinos
Subject
Plant Science,Veterinary (miscalleneous),Animal Science and Zoology,Microbiology,Food Science,Parasitology
Reference51 articles.
1. Codex Alimentarius , 2009. Foods derived from modern biotechnology. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme. Rome, Italy. 85 pp.
2. Relevance of Bt toxin interaction studies for environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops;De Schrijver;Plant Biotechnology Journal,2015
3. Eastham K and Sweet J, 2002. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): the significance of gene flow through pollen transfer. European Environment Agency. Available online: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental_issue_report_2002_28
4. EcoƩtat , 2014. Bacillus thuringiensis toxins: their mode of action and the potential interaction between them.
5. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms on a request from the Commission related to the Notification (Reference C/NL/00/10) for the placing on the market of insect‐tolerant genetically modified maize 1507, for import and processing, under Part C of Directive 2001/18/EC from Pioneer Hi‐Bred International/Mycogen Seeds;EFSA;EFSA Journal,2004