Modification of the terms of authorisation regarding the additive consisting of liquid l‐lysine base produced with Corynebacterium glutamicum NRRL B‐67439 and NRRL B‐67535 for all animal species (ADM specialty ingredients (Europe) B.V.)
-
Published:2024-07
Issue:7
Volume:22
Page:
-
ISSN:1831-4732
-
Container-title:EFSA Journal
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:EFS2
Author:
,Villa Roberto Edoardo,Azimonti Giovanna,Bonos Eleftherios,Christensen Henrik,Durjava Mojca,Dusemund Birgit,Gehring Ronette,Glandorf Boet,Kouba Maryline,López‐Alonso Marta,Marcon Francesca,Nebbia Carlo,Pechová Alena,Prieto‐Maradona Miguel,Röhe Ilen,Theodoridou Katerina,Herman Lieve,Anguita Montserrat,Innocenti Matteo L.,Pettenati Elisa,Tarrés‐Call Jordi,Pizzo Fabiola,Brozzi Rosella
Abstract
Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of liquid l‐lysine base produced with a genetically modified strain of Corynebacterium glutamicum as a nutritional feed additive for all animal species. The l‐lysine base liquid produced with C. glutamicum NRRL B‐67535 and NRRL B‐67439 is currently authorised as a nutritional additive for all animal species. The present application is aimed at modifying the current authorisation to include C. glutamicum NRRL B‐68248 as a production strain. The new production strain qualifies for the qualified presumption of safety approach when used for production purposes. It was unambiguously identified as C. glutamicum and was shown not to harbour acquired antimicrobial resistance determinants for antibiotics of human and veterinary importance. All the introduced sequences or mutations were considered to be safe, and no viable cells or DNA of the NRRL B‐68248 strain was detected in the final product. Therefore, the final product does not pose any safety concern associated with the production strain. l‐Lysine base produced using C. glutamicum NRRL B‐68248 does not represent a risk for the target species, the consumer or the environment. The additive was considered to be neither irritant to skin or the eyes, nor a dermal sensitiser. l‐Lysine base produced with C. glutamicum NRRL B‐68248 is considered to be an efficacious source of the essential amino acid l‐lysine for non‐ruminant animal species. For the supplemental l‐lysine to be as efficacious in ruminants as in non‐ruminant species, it would require protection against degradation in the rumen.
Reference12 articles.
1. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) . (2021). EFSA statement on the requirements for whole genome sequence analysis of microorganisms intentionally used in the food chain. EFSA Journal, 19(7), 6506. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6506 2. EFSA BIOHAZ Panel (EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards) , Koutsoumanis, K., Allende, A., Álvarez‐Ordóñez, A., Bolton, D., Bover‐Cid, S., Chemaly, M., De Cesare, A., Hilbert, F., Lindqvist, R., Nauta, M., Peixe, L., Ru, G., Simmons, M., Skandamis, P., Suffredini, E., Cocconcelli, P. S., Fernández Escámez, P. S., Prieto Maradona, M., … Herman, L. (2023). Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microorganisms intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA. EFSA Journal, 21(1), 7747. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7747 3. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed) , Rychen, G., Aquilina, G., Azimonti, G., Bampidis, V., Bastos, M. L., Bories, G., Chesson, A., Cocconcelli, P. S., Flachowsky, G., Gropp, J., Kolar, B., Kouba, M., López‐Alonso, M., López Puente, S., Mantovani, A., Mayo, B., Ramos, F., Saarela, M., … Innocenti, M. L. (2017a). Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the consumer. EFSA Journal, 15(10), 5022. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5022 4. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed) , Rychen, G., Aquilina, G., Azimonti, G., Bampidis, V., Bastos, M. L., Bories, G., Chesson, A., Cocconcelli, P. S., Flachowsky, G., Gropp, J., Kolar, B., Kouba, M., López‐Alonso, M., López Puente, S., Mantovani, A., Mayo, B., Ramos, F., Saarela, M., … Innocenti, M. L. (2017b). Guidance on the identity, characterisation and conditions of use of feed additives. EFSA Journal, 15(10), 5023. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5023 5. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed) , Rychen, G., Aquilina, G., Azimonti, G., Bampidis, V., Bastos, M. L., Bories, G., Chesson, A., Cocconcelli, P. S., Flachowsky, G., Gropp, J., Kolar, B., Kouba, M., López‐Alonso, M., López Puente, S., Mantovani, A., Mayo, B., Ramos, F., Saarela, M., … Martino, L. (2017c). Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the target species. EFSA Journal, 15(10), 5021. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5021
|
|