Assessment of genetically modified maize DP910521 (application GMFF‐2021‐2473)

Author:

,Mullins Ewen,Bresson Jean‐Louis,Dalmay Tamas,Dewhurst Ian Crawford,Epstein Michelle M.,Firbank Leslie George,Guerche Philippe,Hejatko Jan,Naegeli Hanspeter,Moreno Francisco Javier,Nogué Fabien,Rostoks Nils,Sánchez Serrano Jose Juan,Savoini Giovanni,Veromann Eve,Veronesi Fabio,Ardizzone Michele,De Sanctis Giacomo,Dumont Antonio Fernandez,Gennaro Andrea,Gómez Ruiz José Ángel,Grammatikou Paschalina,Goumperis Tilemachos,Lenzi Paolo,Lewandowska Aleksandra,Camargo Ana Martin,Neri Franco Maria,Piffanelli Pietro,Raffaello Tommaso,Xiftou Kyriaki

Abstract

Abstract Genetically modified (GM) maize DP910521 was developed to confer resistance against certain lepidopteran insect pests as well as tolerance to glufosinate herbicide; these properties were achieved by introducing the mo‐pat, pmi and cry1B.34 expression cassettes. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses did not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the identified differences in the agronomic/phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between maize DP910521 and its conventional counterpart needs further assessment except for the levels of iron in grain, which do not raise safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the Cry1B.34, PAT and PMI proteins as expressed in maize DP910521. The GMO panel finds no evidence that the genetic modification impacts the overall safety of maize DP910521. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from maize DP910521 does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DP910521 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and non‐GM maize varieties tested, and no post‐market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of maize DP910521 material into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize DP910521. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DP910521 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non‐GM maize varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference59 articles.

1. Phytic acid chemistry: Influence on Phytin‐phosphorus availability and phytase efficacy;Angel;Journal of Applied Poultry Research,2002

2. Molecular properties of food allergens;Breiteneder;Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology,2005

3. Codex Alimentarius . (2009). Foods derived from modern biotechnology. Codex Alimentarius commission, joint FAO/ WHO food standards Programme, Rome, Italy. 85 pp. https://www.fao.org/docrep/011/a1554e/a1554e00.htm

4. Are physicochemical properties shaping the allergenic potency of plant allergens?;Costa;Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology,2022

5. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): The significance of gene flow through pollen transfer;Eastham;European Environment Agency, Environmental Issue Report,2002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3