Author:
,Mullins Ewen,Bresson Jean‐Louis,Dalmay Tamas,Dewhurst Ian Crawford,Epstein Michelle M.,Firbank Leslie George,Guerche Philippe,Hejatko Jan,Naegeli Hanspeter,Moreno Francisco Javier,Nogué Fabien,Rostoks Nils,Sánchez Serrano Jose Juan,Savoini Giovanni,Veromann Eve,Veronesi Fabio,Ardizzone Michele,De Sanctis Giacomo,Dumont Antonio Fernandez,Gennaro Andrea,Gómez Ruiz José Ángel,Grammatikou Paschalina,Goumperis Tilemachos,Lenzi Paolo,Lewandowska Aleksandra,Camargo Ana Martin,Neri Franco Maria,Piffanelli Pietro,Raffaello Tommaso,Xiftou Kyriaki
Abstract
Abstract
Genetically modified (GM) maize DP910521 was developed to confer resistance against certain lepidopteran insect pests as well as tolerance to glufosinate herbicide; these properties were achieved by introducing the mo‐pat, pmi and cry1B.34 expression cassettes. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses did not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the identified differences in the agronomic/phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between maize DP910521 and its conventional counterpart needs further assessment except for the levels of iron in grain, which do not raise safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the Cry1B.34, PAT and PMI proteins as expressed in maize DP910521. The GMO panel finds no evidence that the genetic modification impacts the overall safety of maize DP910521. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from maize DP910521 does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DP910521 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and non‐GM maize varieties tested, and no post‐market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of maize DP910521 material into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize DP910521. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DP910521 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non‐GM maize varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
Reference59 articles.
1. Phytic acid chemistry: Influence on Phytin‐phosphorus availability and phytase efficacy;Angel;Journal of Applied Poultry Research,2002
2. Molecular properties of food allergens;Breiteneder;Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology,2005
3. Codex Alimentarius . (2009). Foods derived from modern biotechnology. Codex Alimentarius commission, joint FAO/ WHO food standards Programme, Rome, Italy. 85 pp. https://www.fao.org/docrep/011/a1554e/a1554e00.htm
4. Are physicochemical properties shaping the allergenic potency of plant allergens?;Costa;Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology,2022
5. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): The significance of gene flow through pollen transfer;Eastham;European Environment Agency, Environmental Issue Report,2002