Evaluating Functional and Non-Functional Distractors and Their Relationship with Difficulty and Discrimination Indices in Four-Option Multiple-Choice Questions

Author:

Shakurnia Abdolhussein, ,Ghafourian Mehri,Khodadadi Ali,Ghadiri Ata,Amari Afshin,Shariffat Moosa, , , , ,

Abstract

Multiple-choice questions-one best answer (MCQ-OBA) is the most frequently accepted assessment tool in Iran’s medical universities. Writing functional distractors (FDs) is an important aspect of framing MCQ-OBA. This study aimed to assess FDs and non-functional distractors (NFDs) in MCQ-OBA and the association of distractor efficiency with difficulty and discrimination indices. This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Immunology, the Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. A total of 734 MCQ-OBA were reviewed, including 2,936 options (2,202 distractors and 734 correct responses). NFDs were defined as options chosen by <5% of examinees. Of the 734 MCQ-OBAs, 265 (36.1%) had 0 NFDs, 231 (31.5%) had 1 NFD, 146 (19.9%) had 2 NFDs, and 92 (12.5%) had 3 NFDs. The Pearson’s correlation showed a significant relationship between the difficulty index and the number of NFDs (r = 0.453; P < 0.0001). However, the correlation between the discrimination index and the number of NFDs was insignificant (r = 0.055; P = 0.135). The findings revealed that NFDs inversely affected the test quality of items. Items with more NFDs were easier and had poorer discriminatory power. The distractor function analysis and revision of NFDs serve as an important method to improve the quality of MCQ-OBA.

Publisher

Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia

Subject

Nursing (miscellaneous),Health Professions (miscellaneous),Education,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Q-GENius: A GPT Based Modified MCQ Generator for Identifying Learner Deficiency;Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners, Doctoral Consortium and Blue Sky;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3