Who Puts the ‘Open’ in Open Knowledge?

Author:

Montgomery Lucy1,Neylon Cameron1,Wilson Katie1,Huang Chun-Kai (Karl)1,Hosking Richard1,Ozaygen Alkim1,Handcock Rebecca1

Affiliation:

1. Curtin University , Perth AU

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the concept of ‘open’ knowledge – and the growing importance of digital literacies in supporting a transformation of universities into open knowledge institutions. In order to operate as successful open knowledge institutions, universities must do more than support the transmission of research outcomes from experts located within the university to external communities. They must engage in knowledge-making with communities. This involves questions of equity, diversity and inclusion – who gets to make knowledge; as well the role of productive interactions across boundaries (disciplines/university/wider community) in its growth and spread. There is a genuine desire among many universities, research funders, and researchers themselves, to address the challenges of diversity, equity and impact implicit in the open knowledge agenda. However, open knowledge aspirations are being stymied by comparative rankings that are built on data that excludes the work of entire disciplines, continents and languages; and are not capable of capturing important aspects of the value universities create. Many of the stakeholders using these rankings to inform decision-making are unaware of the prejudices and blind spots that current measurement tools create and perpetuate. They are also unaware that it is possible to interact critically with the tools used to measure and narrate performance; to demand that new questions are asked of the digital traces that universities and research communities create; and build better tools for understanding the role of universities in processes of knowledge-making and sharing. As this paper discusses, the Curtin Open Knowledge Initiative, a major research project funded by Curtin University, is a deliberate effort to support the new forms of digital literacy needed to enable this shift.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

Reference35 articles.

1. Aksnes, DW and Sivertsen, G. 2019. A criteria-based assessment of the coverage of Scopus and Web of Science. 4(1): 1–21. DOI:10.2478/jdis-2019-0001

2. Benneworth, P, Olmos Peñuela, J, Montgomery, L, Neylon, C, Hartley, J and Wilson, K. 2019. The ‘open’ university as a transformer of public service ideals. In: Humanities and Higher Education: Generating synergies between Science, Technology and Humanities, Higher Education in the World 7. Girona, Spain: Global University Network for Innovation, pp. 453–461.

3. Billaut, J-C, Bouyssou, D and Vincke, P. 2010. Should you believe in the Shanghai Ranking? Scientometrics, 84(1): 237–263. DOI:10.1007/s11192-009-0115-x

4. Chan, T, Fung, M and Chang, N. 2016. The role of universities, the rise of rankings, and internationalization. In: Liu, NC, Cheng, Y and Wang, Q. Matching visibility and performance: A standing challenge for world-class universities. Global perspectives on higher education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. DOI:10.1007/978-94-6300-773-3_14

5. COKI. (n.d.). COKI – Home. Curtin Open Knowledge Initiative. Available at http://openknowledge.community [Last accessed 25 May 2020].

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3