A User-Friendly Dashboard for Tracking Global Open Access Performance

Author:

Diprose James P.1ORCID,Hosking Richard1ORCID,Rigoni Richard,Roelofs Aniek2ORCID,Chien Tuan-Yow1ORCID,Napier Kathryn2ORCID,Wilson Katie3ORCID,Huang Chun-Kai (Karl)1ORCID,Handcock Rebecca N.4ORCID,Montgomery Lucy1ORCID,Neylon Cameron1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Culture and Technology, Curtin University

2. Curtin University, Curtin Institute for Computation

3. Faculty of Education, Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington

4. Curtin Institute for Computation, Curtin University

Abstract

We identify two issues that obstruct the clear assessment of open access publishing performance by academics, librarians, and other stakeholders. Firstly, the current open access categories are difficult to understand and reason about. Secondly, there are no easily accessible tools that allow many countries and institutions to view their open access publishing performance. To address the first issue, we have re-designed the open access categories using descriptive category names rather than opaque colour names, re-organised the categories into a hierarchy to facilitate top-down comprehension, and presented publisher and repository-based open access categories without preferencing one category over the other. To address the second issue, we have developed the COKI Open Access Dashboard, an open-source, public dashboard for measuring and visualising the open access performance of 189 countries and over 7000 institutions. We explore the design decisions underlying the redesigned categories and the dashboard.

Publisher

University of Michigan Library

Subject

Information Systems

Reference48 articles.

1. A Criteria-Based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science;Journal of Data and Information Science,2019

2. Archambault, Éric, Grégoire Côté, Brooke Struck, and Matthieu Voorons. 2016. “Research Impact of Paywalled versus Open Access Papers.” Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, Etc., August 2, 2016. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/29.

3. Do Journals Flipping to Gold Open Access Show an OA Citation or Publication Advantage?;Scientometrics,2020

4. Should You Believe in the Shanghai Ranking?;Scientometrics,2010

5. The Open Access Movement at a Crossroad: Are the Big Publishers and Academic Social Media Taking Over?;Learned Publishing,2016

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3