Affiliation:
1. University of Delaware, 125 E., Main Street, Newark DE, 19716
2. Pennsylvania State University, 202 Old Botany Building, University Park PA 16802
Abstract
It is common to hypothesize that in classifier and non-classifier languages alike the various functional heads (determiner/demonstrative, numeral, classifier) each head their own projection, so that the maximal projection of the nominal phrase is not NP but something like DP. We evaluate the predictions this makes regarding selection and verb-object idioms in English, a non-classifier language, and in Korean and Vietnamese, two classifier languages. These predictions are not upheld, and nominals act very differently from clauses and PPs, which are headed by functional heads. Selection and idioms show that the maximal projection of the nominal must be a projection of the lexical N itself, not a functional element. We develop such an analysis of nominals, and show how it accounts for data that was taken to motivate the DP Hypothesis.
Publisher
Open Library of the Humanities
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference142 articles.
1. Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive-cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut dissertation. Available at: https://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000049.
2. A unified approach to split scope;Abels, KlausLuisa Martí;Natural Language Semantics,2010
3. Abney, Steven Paul. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
4. The syntax and semantics of unselected embedded questions;Adger, DavidJosep Quer;Language,2001
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献