The morphosyntax of Gothic preverb compounds: incorporation and applicativisation

Author:

Tan Tamisha L.

Abstract

AbstractGothic preverb compounds illustrate several interesting characteristics, including multiple preverb stacking, idiomatisation, tmesis (i.e., separation by clitics), and P-copying (i.e., multiple pronunciation of the preverb). This paper is a close examination of the morphosyntax of these compounds, highlighting novel empirical generalisations about the Gothic language with key theoretical implications for our understanding of Germanic complex verbs and the alternations they participate in. In particular, this paper proposes a structural distinction between preverb compounds which are obligatorily semantically transparent and those which are optionally idiomatic. In arguing that transparent compounds involve the mechanism of preposition incorporation and m-merger, paralleling recent accounts of clitic doubling, while idiomatic compounds involve a thematic high applicative projection, this paper captures nuanced differences in these compounds’ case assignment and argument licensing behaviour. These structural differences will be shown to derive these two compound types’ constrained interaction with the aforementioned phenomena of stacking, tmesis, and copying. In addition, this paper compares Gothic complex verbs to their cross-linguistic correlates within and beyond Germanic, whilst also providing a diachronic pathway for the development of (multiple) preverb compounds.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference126 articles.

1. Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding. PhD diss, Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.

2. Abels, Klaus. 2012. Phases: an essay on cyclicity in syntax. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110284225.

3. Acedo Matellán, Víctor. 2010. Argument structure and the syntax-morphology interface. a case study in Latin and other languages. PhD diss, Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.

4. Anagnostopoulou, Elena, and Yota Samioti. 2013. Allosemy, idioms and their domains: Evidence from adjectival participles. In Syntax and its limits, eds. Raffaella Folli, Christina Sevdali, and Robert Truswell, 218–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199683239.003.0012

5. Arregi, Karlos, and Asia Pietraszko. 2021. Unifying long head movement with phrasal movement: A new argument from spellout. In Proceedings of the 38th west coast conference on formal linguistics, eds. Rachel Soo, Una Y. Chow, and Sander Nederveen, 21–31. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3