Affiliation:
1. University of Calgary 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary
Abstract
This study deals with the English mass-count distinction and how it cues meaning. 40 native speakers of Korean processed common nouns in their L2 (English) and in Korean. English native speakers performed the same English task. Anglophones individuated both count nouns and mass nouns denoting collections of entities. They were also acutely sensitive to plural-marking as a cue to the meaning of ambiguous “flexible” nouns denoting either bounded entities or substances. Koreans were target-like on 3 classes of English nouns but were insensitive to plural-marking on English flexible nouns. A comparison of English- and Korean-language tasks revealed that Koreans were using the same types of responses on semantically similar Korean and English items, consistent with the hypothesis that they use lexical semantics (not grammar) to arrive at an interpretation. Our study shows that Koreans perform at native-like levels on a judgement task involving the 3 most common classes of English nouns while remaining insensitive to English plural-marking. Learners do not make use of the mass-count syntax of English to interpret common nouns and appear not to have learnt plural-marking.
Publisher
Open Library of the Humanities
Reference71 articles.
1. Nouns and countability;Allen, Keith;Language,1980
2. On the structure of names;Anderson, John M.;Folia Linguistica,2003
3. On the grammatical status of names;Anderson, John M.;Language,2004
4. Quantity judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count;Barner, DavidJesse Snedeker;Cognition,2005
5. Children’s early understanding of mass-count syntax: Individuations, lexical content, and the number asymmetry hypothesis;Barner, DavidJesse Snedeker;Language Learning and Development,2006
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献