ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF DIGITAL SURGERY IN DENTAL REHABILITATION. LITERATURE REVIEW WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE CLINICAL CASE-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF DIGITAL SURGERY IN DENTAL REHABILITATION. LITERATURE REVIEW WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE CLINICAL CASE

Published:2021-02-09 Issue:4 Volume:16 Page:13-19
ISSN:2077-7566
Container-title:Actual problems in dentistry
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Ivashov Aleksandr¹,Dement'eva Kristina¹,Nersesyan Petros²,Mandra Yuliya¹,Khodko Valery¹

Affiliation:

1. Ural State Medical University

2. Ural'skiy gosudarstvennyy medicinskiy universitet

Abstract

Subject. With the advent of advanced imaging technology and CAD/CAM technologies, the possibility of guided surgery has become of wide interest among implantology. The article is devoted to the use of surgical template implantation in the rehabilitation of a dental patient. It provides information about some advantages and disadvantages of the digital protocol in comparison with traditional dental implantation. The main stages of navigation surgery in a clinical case are described. Goal. To evaluate the actual clinical advantages and disadvantages of dental implant placement using a surgical template compared to the traditional treatment protocol. Methodology. The literature search was conducted in scientific search bibliographic databases such as PubMed, eLIBRARY, Medline, and Google Academy. More than 384 studies up to 2014 were found under the thematic headings "Dental implantation" and "Surgical template". During the study of these works, the sample included 56 articles and literature reviews. Conclusions. Recently, implant placement using a surgical template has become a popular treatment method among dental surgeons. The study of modern literature allowed us to formulate the main advantages and disadvantages of this method. Advantages of the method: precise positioning of implants; flap-free surgery reduces the operation time and is characterized by a favorable postoperative course; integration of restoration determinants in surgical planning, which leads to a more aesthetic, functional and predictable result of prosthetics; the possibility of pre-manufacturing a prosthesis based on the planned position of the implant; simplification of the surgical procedure for the dentist. However, this method is not without its drawbacks: the surgeon's inability to visualize anatomical structures; the risk of axis and depth deviation during implant placement; requires additional digital planning.

Publisher

TIRAZH Publishing House

Reference56 articles.

1. Brief J., Edinger D., Hassfeld S., Eggers G. Accuracy of image-guided implantology // Clin Oral Implants Res. – 2005;16 (4):495-501. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01133.x, Brief J., Edinger D., Hassfeld S., Eggers G. Accuracy of image-guided implantology // Clin Oral Implants Res. – 2005;16 (4):495-501. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01133.x

2. Tahmaseb A., Wismeijer D., Coucke W., Derksen W. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review // Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. – 2014;29:25-42., Tahmaseb A., Wismeijer D., Coucke W., Derksen W. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review // Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. – 2014;29:25-42.

3. Vercruyssen M., van de Wiele G., Teughels W., Naert I., Jacobs R., Quirynen M. Implant- and patient-centred outcomes of guided surgery, a 1-year follow-up: an RCT comparing guided surgery with conventional implant placement // J Clin Periodontol. – 2014;41 (12):1154-1160., Vercruyssen M., van de Wiele G., Teughels W., Naert I., Jacobs R., Quirynen M. Implant- and patient-centred outcomes of guided surgery, a 1-year follow-up: an RCT comparing guided surgery with conventional implant placement // J Clin Periodontol. – 2014;41 (12):1154-1160.

4. Pozzi A., Tallarico M., Marchetti M., Scarfò B., Esposito M. Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial // Eur J Oral Implantol. – 2014;7 (3):229-242., Pozzi A., Tallarico M., Marchetti M., Scarfò B., Esposito M. Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial // Eur J Oral Implantol. – 2014;7 (3):229-242.

5. Cassetta M., Giansanti M., Di Mambro A., Stefanelli L. V. Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible // Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. – 2014;29 (5): 1071-1078., Cassetta M., Giansanti M., Di Mambro A., Stefanelli L. V. Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible // Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. – 2014;29 (5): 1071-1078.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF NAVIGATION SURGERY FOR DENTAL IMPLANTATION;Actual problems in dentistry;2022-05-17