Vygotsky vs. Freud: on the Rethinking of Psychoanalysis in Terms of Cultural-Historical Psychology

Author:

Zavershneva E.Ju.1

Affiliation:

1. A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Abstract

The paper traces the dynamics of L.S. Vygotsky’s attitude towards Freud’s theory on the material of Vygotsky’s published works and personal notes. It provides an overall picture of Vygotsky’s critical views on psychoanalysis, including his accounts of both weak and progressive assumptions of Freud’s theory. It has been shown that Vygotsky's polemic with Freud was obviously shaped by the development of cultural- historical psychology and reached the point of a potential rivalry between their research programs in late 1932. The paper focuses on the perspectives of rethinking classical psychoanalysis in the context of the ideas of Vygotsky’s last period of life and work (1932—1934), namely, the idea of consciousness as a dynamic system of meaning, the concept of the field of meaning, the relationship between normal and abnormal development, and the idea of freedom as the main feature of human existence. It is stated that Vygotsky did not seek to eliminate any competing theories (in particular, psychoanalysis), but rather remained in dialogue with them and contributed to making their foundations more clear.

Publisher

Federal State-Financed Educational Institution of Higher Education Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Subject

Psychology (miscellaneous),Social Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Cultural Studies,Applied Psychology

Reference40 articles.

1. Birenbaum G.V., Zeigarnik B.V. K dinamicheskomu analizu rasstroistv myshleniya [To dymanic analisys of thought diturbances]. Sovetskaya nevropatologiya, psikhiatriya i gigiena [Soviet neuropathology, psychiatry and psychohygiene], 1935, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 75—98.

2. Veresov  N.N.  Eksperimental’no-geneticheskii  metod i psikhologiya soznaniya: v poiskakh utrachennogo (stat’ya vtoraya) [Experimental genetic method and psychology of consciousness: in search of the lost (part two)]. Kul’turno- istoricheskaya psikhologiya [Cultural-historical psychology], 2015, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 117—126. (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.). doi:10.17759/chp.2015110113

3. Voloshinov V.N. Po tu storonu sotsial’nogo: O fre- idizme [Beyond the social: on Freudianism]. Zvezda [The star], 1925, no. 5, pp. 186—214.

4. Voloshinov V.N. Freidizm. Kriticheskii ocherk [Freud- ianism: A Critical Essay]. Moscow; Leningrad: G.I.Z., 1927. 164 p.

5. Vygotskii L.S. Igra i ee rol’ v psikhicheskom razvitii re- benka [The play and its role in the mental development of the child]. In Psikhologiya razvitiya [Developmental psychology]. Saint-Petersburg: Piter, 2001, pp. 56—79.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3