Affiliation:
1. Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education
2. Perm State University
3. The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Abstract
<p>In decision-making research, the most common point of view is the synonymous similarity of intentions and actions. Most experimental procedures “reduce” them into a single act. Understanding the conventionality of separating these concepts, we distinguish two types of tasks. The first one involves only the intention and the second one also involves its subsequent behavioral implementation. The purpose of our study is to compare the risky choice as an intention and as an action. The hypothesis of various manifestations of risk-related personality traits in choice as an intention and as an action was tested. 462 students from 17 to 46 years old (M=21.20, SD=3.09) became participants in the study, including 80 male (17.3%) and 382 female (82.7%). To measure risk as intention, the participants were offered a case describing a hypothetical gambling game. To measure risk as an action, it was proposed to play a computer game of similar content. The results of one-way ANOVA (between group measures) showed that the choice of risk at the level of intention did not allow to fix the personal correlates of the decision making, however, at the level of real actions, its correlations with the Dark Triad and Uncertainty Tolerance appeared. These empirical facts were interpreted in the logic of cognitive, motivational and socio-psychological approaches. The results obtained can be used in the field of forecasting economic risks.</p>
Publisher
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference30 articles.
1. Diev V.S. Neopredelennost', riski prinyatie reshenii v mezhdistsiplinarnom kontekste [Uncertainty, risk and decision-making in an interdisciplinary context]. Sibirskii filosofskii zhurnal = Siberian Journal of Philosophy, 2019. V. 17(4). P. 41—52. DOI:10.25205/2541-7517-2019-17-4-41-52 (In Russ.).
2. Egorova M.S. Makiavellizm v structure lichnostnykh svoistv [Machiavellianism in the structure of personality traits]. Vestnik Permskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya 10. Differentsial'naya psikhologiya = Bulletin of the Perm State Pedagogical University. Series 10. Differential Psychology. 2009. V. 1/2. P. 65—80. (In Russ.).
3. Egorova M.S., Sitnikova M.A., Parshikova O.V. Adaptatsiya Korotkogo oprosnika Temnoi triady [Adaptation of the Short Dark Triad]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological research. 2015. V. 8(43). P. 1. URL: http://psystudy.ru (Accessed 11.09.2021). (In Russ.).
4. Kahneman D. Dumai medlenno... reshai bistro [Thinking, fast and slow]. Moscow: AST, 2017. 653 p. (In Russ.).
5. Kozeletskii Yu. Psikhologicheskaya teoriya reshenii [Psychological theory of decision]. Moscow: Progress, 1979. 504 p. (In Russ.).