Affiliation:
1. Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
2. Moscow State University of Psychology & Education
3. Moscow State University of Psychology & Education (MSUPE)
Abstract
<p>A comparative analysis of the assessments of digital educational technologies by teachers (mean age – 49±12 years) of various Russian Federation universities who have experience in using them in their professional activities (N=110) and teachers who do not have such experience (N=40) is carried out. The samples are equivalent in gender, academic titles and degrees, age, and work experience. The main advantages are the following: access to information at any convenient time; flexible schedule and the ability to organize independent work. Among the difficulties technical failures, lack of personal contacts, inconvenience of working with an electronic course and the need to spend a long time at the computer were noted. Teachers with experience in the development of e-learning courses rate work in an electronic environment much more positively, in contrast to teachers without experience who exaggerate the frequency of technical failures, point out the lack of technical and legal support, and the difficulties in monitoring assignments. All the teachers can be divided into “skeptics” and “enthusiasts” in relation to the acceptance of digital environment. “Enthusiasts”, unlike “skeptics”, have a positive attitude to innovations, believe that the educational process becomes more flexible and intense, emphasize the growth of student involvement and independence, individualization of training, support from management, colleagues, technical support, transparency of interaction. Most teachers with experience in using e-learning courses turned out to be “enthusiasts”. The groups of “enthusiasts” and “skeptics” do not differ in gender, age, and professional experience, which indicates the possible presence of “second order” barriers: pedagogical beliefs that prevent the acceptance of e-learning.</p>
Publisher
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Social Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous)
Reference31 articles.
1. Avakyan I.B. Stremlenie k samorazvitiyu kak faktor innovatsionnoi gotovnosti prepodavatelei vuzov [Self-development as a factor in the readiness of university teachers for innovation]. Obrazovanie i samorazvitie = The Journal of Education and Self Development. 2020. Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 88–102. (In Russ.; abstr. in Engl.).
2. Shurukhina T.N. et al. Analiz pervykh rezul'tatov perekhoda rossiiskogo obrazovaniya na distantsionnye formaty v period mirovoi pandemii COVID-19 [Analysis of the First Results of the Transition of Russian Education to Remote Formats During the World Pandemic COVID-19]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education, 2020, no. 6. DOI:10.17513/spno.30265 (In Russ.; abstr. in Engl.).
3. Burganova L.A., Yur'eva O.V. Otnoshenie vuzovskikh prepodavatelei k ispol'zovaniyu tsifrovykh tekhnologii: sotsiologichksii analiz [Attitude of Higher Educational Teachers to the Usage of Digital Technologies: Sociological Analysis]. Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii = The Review of Economy, the Law and Sociology, 2020, no. 1, pp. 105–108. (In Russ.; abstr. in Engl.).
4. Verbitskii A.A. Tsifrovoe obuchenie: problemy, riski i perspektivy [Digital learning: problems, risks and prospects] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Homo Cyberus, 2019, no 1(6). Available at: http://journal.homocyberus.ru/Verbitskiy_AA_1_2019 (Accessed 15.03.2022). (In Russ.; abstr. in Engl.).
5. Dozhdikov A.V. Onlain-obuchenie kak e-learning: kachestvo i rezul'taty (kriticheskii analiz) [Online Learning as e-Learning: The Quality and Results (Critical Analysis)]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia, 2020. Vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 21–32. DOI:10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-12-21-32 (In Russ.; abstr. in Engl.).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献