Affiliation:
1. Don State Technical University
2. Southern Federal University
Abstract
<p>This study aims to comprehensively explore the emotional, personal, and metacognitive predictors of the psychological well-being of teachers. The article presents the results of identifying personality traits, features of the emotional sphere and regulation of emotions, as well as features of metacognition that can influence well-being of teachers in modern conditions. To measure these characteristics, the following methods were used: a short portrait questionnaire of the Big Five; methodology “Differential Scale of Emotions”; methodology for diagnosing the subjective well-being of the individual; Metacognitive Awareness Inventory; test “Differential Type of Reflection”; Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire and the author's self-assessment questionnaire of metacognitive behavior “Metacognitive Skills in the Structure of Educational and Professional Activities”. Study sample: 106 people aged 20 to 75 years (average age 45,85) – teachers, lecturers, heads of departments of higher educational institutions and colleges. It is shown that the higher levels of metacognitive involvement correspond to the higher levels of subjective well-being. A high index of positive emotions, higher levels of trait conscientiousness and conscious use of metacognitive skills, positive revision and acceptance strategies, and lower acute negative emotions index also have a positive effect. The results described can be helpful in preventative and therapeutic work with the symptoms of professional burnout of teachers.</p>
Publisher
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Reference30 articles.
1. Altynnikova N.V., Dorofeev A.V., Musaev A.A., Sagitov S.T. Upravlenie kachestvom pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya na osnove diagnostiki professional'nyh deficitov uchitelya: teoretiko-metodicheskij aspect [Quality management of pedagogical education based on the diagnosis of professional teacher deficits: theoretical and methodological aspect]. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological science and education], 2022, no. 1(27), pp. 65–81. DOI:10.17759/pse.2022270106 (In Russ.).
2. Baeva I.A. Model' psihologicheskoj bezopasnosti podrostka v obrazovatel'noj srede [Model of psychological safety of a teenager in an educational environment]. Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gercena [Izvestia of the Russian State Pedagogical University named after A.I. Herzen], 2019, no. 194, pp. 7–15. (In Russ.).
3. Denisova E.G. Razrabotka ankety samootsenki metakognitivnogo povedeniya «Metakognitivnyye navyki v strukture uchebno-professional'noy deyatel'nosti» [Development of a self-assessment questionnaire for metacognitive behavior "Metacognitive skills in the educational and professional activities"]. Innovatsionnaya nauka: Psikhologiya. Pedagogika. Defektologiya [Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology]. 2022. Vol. 5(2), pp. 6–24. DOI:10.23947/2658-7165-2022-5-2-6-24 (In Russ.).
4. Denisova E.G., Ermakov P.N., Abakumova I.V., Sylka N.V. Emotsional'no-lichnostnyye i metakognitivnyye prediktory psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya studentov v sovremennykh usloviyakh [Emotions, Personality Traits and Metacognitions as Predictors of Students’ Psychological Well-being in Contemporary Situation]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 2022. Vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 85–96. DOI:10.17759/pse.2022270507 (In Russ.).
5. Lazareva O.V. K voprosu o vliyanii metakognitivnyh processov na ponimanie nauchnogo teksta [On the question of the influence of metacognitive processes on the understanding of a scientific text]. Psihofiziologiya [Psychology. Psychophysiology], 2012, no. 31, pp. 13–17. (In Russ.).