Affiliation:
1. Don State Technical University
2. Southern Federal University
Abstract
This study aims to comprehensively explore the emotional, personal, and metacognitive predictors of students’ psychological well-being. The article presents the results of identifiesying supporting and dysfunctional factors that affect the level of psychological well-being of the current generation of students. Study sample: 317 people subjects aged 18 to 45 years (average age 20.82) — undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate students. To measure these characteristics, the following methods were used: a short portrait questionnaire of the Big Five; methodology “Differential Scale of Emotions”; methodology for diagnosing the subjective well-being of the individual; Metacognitive Awareness Inventory; Metacognitive behavior self-assessment scale; test “Differential type of reflection”; Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire and the author’s self-assessment questionnaire of metacognitive behavior “Metacognitive skills in the structure of educational and professional activities”. It is shown that the level of subjective well-being differs significantly depending on the level of metacognitive involvement. A positive effect is also exerted by a high index of positive emotions, a greater level of extraversion and conscientiousness, and a low level of neuroticism. The data obtained can be helpful in developing programs for forming and reforming individual metacognitive strategies that contribute to successful adaptation and maintaining subjective well-being maintenance.
Publisher
Federal State-Financed Educational Institution of Higher Education Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Social Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous)
Reference26 articles.
1. Berezhnova L.N., Fedoseeva I.A., Tarasov D.Yu. Ponimaniye kommunikativnogo povedeniya kursantov â vazhnoye napravleniye vospitatelânoy raboty [Understanding the communicative behavior of cadets is an important direction of educational work]. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya [Prospects of science and education], 2019, no. 4(40), pp. 425â447. DOI:10.32744/pse.2019.4.33 (In Russ.).
2. Vodiakha S.A. Prediktory psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya studentov [Predictors of psychological well-being of students]. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye v Rossii [Pedagogical education in Russia], 2013, no. 1, pp. 70â74. (In Russ.).
3. Volkova E.N., Miklyaeva A.V., Good V.V. Subâektivnyye predposylki psikhologicheskogo blagopoluchiya odarennykh podrostkov [Subjective prerequisites for psychological well-being of gifted adolescents]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye = Psychological science and education, 2022. Vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 92â103. DOI:10.17759/pse.2022270108 (In Russ.).
4. Gerasimova A.A., Kholmogorova A.B. Strategii sovladaniya, psikhologicheskoye blagopoluchiye i problemnoye ispolâzovaniye interneta v period pandemii [Coping strategies, psychological well-being and problematic use of the Internet during the pandemic]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye = Psychological Science and education, 2020. Vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 31â40. DOI:10.17759/pse.2020250603 (In Russ.).
5. Danilenko O.I. Antitsipatsionnaya sostoyatelânostâ kak prediktor subâyektivnogo blagopoluchiya studentov [Anticipational consistency as a predictor of subjective well-being of students]. Azimut nauchnykh issledovaniy: pedagogika i psikhologiya [Azimut of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology], 2018. Vol. 3, no. 24, pp. 264â268. (In Russ.).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献