Affiliation:
1. National Research University Higher School of Economics (NRU HSE)
Abstract
The modern generation of students actively use technology and have access to information at any time. However, having access to information and being able to competently work with information are two different tasks. The use of information in any form is impossible without the use of critical thinking skills, therefore the level and quality of critical thinking is of paramount importance. Considering that in the modern education system, the traditional type of teaching is quite common — the classroom-lesson form of teaching, where the teacher is the leading figure, providing students with ready-made knowledge at lectures. At the same time, students take a passive position in relation to the assimilation of knowledge. Is it becoming important to understand how to develop students’ higher-order skills, including critical thinking, in this type of learning? In a study conducted on a sample of students from one of the leading national research universities in Russia (4,897 students), using the multivariate regression method, it was proved that teaching within the framework of the traditional type of education can be positively associated with the level of development of critical thinking if teachers have developed subject-logical and organizational competence.
Funder
Russian Foundation for Basic Research
Publisher
Federal State-Financed Educational Institution of Higher Education Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Social Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous)
Reference49 articles.
1. Vygotskii L.S.Mishlenie i rechâ [Thinking and speech]. Moscva, Gosudarstvennoe socialno-economicheskoe izdatelâstvo = Moscow. State Socio- Economic Publishing House, 1934.(In Russ.).
2. Davydov V.V.O ponyatii razvivayushchego obucheniya [About the concept of developing learning].Pedagogika = Pedagogy, 1995.Vol.995, ÑÑ.29â40.(In Russ.).
3. Zagvyazinskii V.I.Teoriya obucheniya.Sovremennaya interpretatsiya [Learning theory modern interpretation].Moscva, Izdatelâskiy centr âAkademiyaâ = Moscow, Publishing Center âAcademyâ, 2001.Vol.30.(In Russ.).
4. Ilâenkov E.V.Shkola dolzhna uchitâ myslitâ [School should teach thinking].Narodnoe obrazovanie = Public education, 1964.Vol.11964, pp.6â55 (In Russ.).
5. Kardanova E.Yu.i dr.Sravnitelânoe issledovanie ubezhdenii i praktik uchitelei matematiki osnovnoi shkoly v Rossii, Estonii i Latvii [A comparative study of the persuasion and practice of mathematics teachers in basic schools in Russia, Estonia and Latvia].Voprosy obrazovaniya= Education issues, 2014, no.2, pp.44â 81 DOI:10.17323/1814-9545-2014-2-44-81 (In Russ.).
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献