accessibility of public urban green space. A case study of Białystok city
-
Published:2021-10-04
Issue:3
Volume:20
Page:203-214
-
ISSN:2450-0771
-
Container-title:Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:ASPAL
Author:
Krzywnicka Iwona,Jankowska Patrycja
Abstract
Motives: Urban green spaces have many functions in cities. They are used for recreational purposes, and they contribute to improving social interactions and community cohesiveness. For this reason, the location and area of urban green spaces should correspond to the size of the city and its population.
Aim: The main aim of this study was to analyze the accessibility of managed and publicly available urban green spaces, referred to as public urban green spaces (PUGS), in four functional and spatial zones in the city of Białystok. The analysis included parks, green squares (pocket parks, ornamental green squares, boulevards) and public forests. The accessibility of PUGS was determined in view of their size and role in the urban spatial structure. Spatial data were processed in GIS and quantitative analyses.
Results: The study demonstrated that the area of PUGS per capita meets the requirements of the World Health Organization (WHO), but the area of parks and green squares should be increased. The accessibility buffers of public green spaces often overlapped, in particular in downtown Białystok (Central zone) which is most abundant in these green infrastructure components. The analysis also revealed locations that do not have access to urban green spaces. The results of the study were used to formulate guidelines for incorporating new green spaces in Białystok and improving the urban spatial structure.
Publisher
Uniwersytet Warminsko-Mazurski
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Urban Studies,Transportation,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference34 articles.
1. Act of 16 April 2004 on Nature Conservation (Journal of Laws, no. 92, item 880) (Poland). 2. Andersson, E., Langemeyer, J., Borgstrom, S., McPhearson, T., Haase, D., Kronenberg J., Barton, D., Davis, M., Naumann, S., Roschel, L., Baro, F. (2019). Enabling Green and Blue Infrastructure to Improve Contributions to Human Well-Being and Equity in Urban Systems. BioScience, 69(7), pp. 566–574. doi:10.1093/biosci/biz058. 3. Biernacka, M., Kronenberg, J., Łaszkiewicz E. (2020). An integrated system of monitoring the availability, accessibility and attractiveness of urban parks and green squares. Applied Geography, 116. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102152. 4. Branas, C.C., Cheney, R.A., MacDonald, J.M., Tam, V.W., Jackson, T.D., Ten Have, T.R. (2011). A difference-in-differences analysis of health, safety, and greening vacant urban space. American Journal of Epidemiology, 174(11), pp. 1296–1306. doi:10.1093/aje/kwr273. 5. Coles, R.W., Bussey, S.C. (2000). Urban forest landscapes in the UK – progressing the social agenda. Landscape and Urban Planning, 52(2–3), pp. 181–188. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00132-8.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|