Author:
Root Kustritz Margaret V.
Abstract
Third-year veterinary students in a required theriogenology diagnostics course were allowed to self-select attendance at a lecture in either the evening or the next morning. One group was presented with PowerPoint slides in a traditional format (T group), and the other group was presented with PowerPoint slides in the assertion-evidence format (A-E group), which uses a single sentence and a highly relevant graphic on each slide to ensure attention is drawn to the most important points in the presentation. Students took a multiple-choice pre-test, attended lecture, and then completed a take-home assignment. All students then completed an online multiple-choice post-test and, one month later, a different online multiple-choice test to evaluate retention. Groups did not differ on pre-test, assignment, or post-test scores, and both groups showed significant gains from pre-test to post-test and from pre-test to retention test. However, the T group showed significant decline from post-test to retention test, while the A–E group did not. Short-term differences between slide designs were most likely unaffected due to required coursework immediately after lecture, but retention of material was superior with the assertion-evidence slide design.
Publisher
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
Subject
General Veterinary,Education,General Medicine
Reference47 articles.
1. Simons, TDoes PowerPoint make you stupid?Presentations Magazine [Internet]. 2004, Mar, cited 2013 Nov 7Available from: http://academic.evergreen.edu/curricular/ATPSMPA/power%20point%20make%20you%20stupid.pdf
2. Tufte, ERPowerPoint is evil.Wired [Internet]. 2003, Sep, cited 2013 Aug 2011.09,Available from: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.09/ppt2.html
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献