Abstract
This article distinguishes two types of legal technology: ‘cheaper lawyers’ (or simply replacing the cognitive operations of lawyers in their existing domains with technology) and ‘transformative artificial legal cognition’ (or introducing the cognitive operations characteristic of lawyers in contexts where human lawyers cannot economically be deployed at all). It then makes the case for finding advances in egalitarian access to justice and the rule of law primarily in the latter category.
Publisher
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献