The effect of inspiratory muscle training and detraining on the respiratory metaboreflex

Abstract

New Findings What is the central question of this study? Is the attenuation of the respiratory muscle metaboreflex preserved after detraining? What is the main finding and its importance? Inspiratory muscle training increased respiratory muscle strength and attenuated the respiratory muscle metaboreflex as evident by lower heart rate and blood pressure. After 5 weeks of no inspiratory muscle training (detraining), respiratory muscle strength was still elevated and the metaboreflex was still attenuated. The benefits of inspiratory muscle training persist after cessation of training, and attenuation of the respiratory metaboreflex follows changes in respiratory muscle strength. AbstractRespiratory muscle training (RMT) improves respiratory muscle (RM) strength and attenuates the RM metaboreflex. However, the time course of muscle function loss after the absence of training or ‘detraining’ is less known and some evidence suggest the respiratory muscles atrophy faster than other muscles. We sought to determine the RM metaboreflex in response to 5 weeks of RMT and 5 weeks of detraining. An experimental group (2F, 6M; 26 ± 4years) completed 5 weeks of RMT and tibialis anterior (TA) training (each 5 days/week at 50% of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and 50% maximal isometric force, respectively) followed by 5 weeks of no training (detraining) while a control group (1F, 7M; 24 ± 1years) underwent no intervention. Prior to training (PRE), post‐training (POST) and post‐detraining (DETR), all participants underwent a loaded breathing task (LBT) to failure (60% MIP) while heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were measured. Five weeks of training increased RM (18 ± 9%, P < 0.001) and TA (+34 ± 19%, P < 0.001) strength and both remained elevated after 5 weeks of detraining (MIP‐POST vs. MIP‐DETR: 154 ± 31 vs. 153 ± 28 cmH2O, respectively, P = 0.853; TA‐POST vs. TA‐DETR: 86 ± 19 vs. 85 ± 16 N, respectively, P = 0.982). However, the rise in MAP during LBT was attenuated POST (−11 ± 17%, P = 0.003) and DETR (−9 ± 9%, P = 0.007) during the iso‐time LBT. The control group had no change in MIP (P = 0.33), TA strength (P = 0.385), or iso‐time MAP (P = 0.867) during LBT across all time points. In conclusion, RM and TA have similar temporal strength gains and the attenuation of the respiratory muscle metaboreflex remains after 5 weeks of detraining.